Hillary Clinton Announces 2016 Presidential Bid

Doesn't matter. Jeb Bush once checked the Hispanic box.

For organization, several topics about Hilary Clinton have been merged together into this one.

Something the Dog Said wrote: Perhaps Toad could enlighten us as to the "accomplishments" of his preferred candidate rather than just hatin' on Obama or Clinton? Can you point to any GOP candidate that remotely has any qualifications or accomplishments. Other than being under indictiment or investigation (Walker, Perry, Christie, all being investigated or indicted).

Not that it matters as the Koch Bros. announced today that Scott Walker would be anointed as the GOP candidate as their personal choice of sycophant. It looks like he will be the beneficiary of their almost $1 billion in "speech" that they have announced that they would spend in the 2016 election.

www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/201...r-scott-walker/?_r=0

Even though this college dropout has shown himself to be a total nincompoop in regard to foreign policy, all that matters is that he is willing to march to the orders of his masters.

I do find it interesting that recent polls show that he would not even carry Wisconsin. But with nearly a billion dollars to run negative ads will probably change that.


Way too early for polls to have any viability, but it is interesting that the latest CNN national poll released today had these results:

Clinton 56% vs Bush 39%
Clinton 58% vs Christie 39%
Clinton 55% vs Rubio 41%
Clinton 58% vs Huckabee 37%
Clinton 58% vs Paul 39%
Clinton 60% vs Carson 36%
Clinton 59% vs Walker 39%
Clinton 60% vs Cruz 36

Just curious who do you think is better qualified to be POTUS, a one term senator and four year Sec'y of State versus state governors who have served eight years? Wouldn't you think managing a large state like Florida would be much better experience for being POTUS than being one of one hundred voters in the Senate.

FredHayek wrote: Just curious who do you think is better qualified to be POTUS, a one term senator and four year Sec'y of State versus state governors who have served eight years? Wouldn't you think managing a large state like Florida would be much better experience for being POTUS than being one of one hundred voters in the Senate.

I think it's obvious that some think the best person for the job is anyone with a 'D' after their name. Issues? Experience? Ethics? All that can just go spit, as long as they're registered with the 'D'.

The most important poll numbers: Clinton 50%-Any other Socialist 50%

FredHayek wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Perhaps Toad could enlighten us as to the "accomplishments" of his preferred candidate rather than just hatin' on Obama or Clinton? Can you point to any GOP candidate that remotely has any qualifications or accomplishments. Other than being under indictiment or investigation (Walker, Perry, Christie, all being investigated or indicted).

Not that it matters as the Koch Bros. announced today that Scott Walker would be anointed as the GOP candidate as their personal choice of sycophant. It looks like he will be the beneficiary of their almost $1 billion in "speech" that they have announced that they would spend in the 2016 election.

www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/201...r-scott-walker/?_r=0

Even though this college dropout has shown himself to be a total nincompoop in regard to foreign policy, all that matters is that he is willing to march to the orders of his masters.

I do find it interesting that recent polls show that he would not even carry Wisconsin. But with nearly a billion dollars to run negative ads will probably change that.


Way too early for polls to have any viability, but it is interesting that the latest CNN national poll released today had these results:

Clinton 56% vs Bush 39%
Clinton 58% vs Christie 39%
Clinton 55% vs Rubio 41%
Clinton 58% vs Huckabee 37%
Clinton 58% vs Paul 39%
Clinton 60% vs Carson 36%
Clinton 59% vs Walker 39%
Clinton 60% vs Cruz 36

Just curious who do you think is better qualified to be POTUS, a one term senator and four year Sec'y of State versus state governors who have served eight years? Wouldn't you think managing a large state like Florida would be much better experience for being POTUS than being one of one hundred voters in the Senate.

Looking back at recent POTUS administrations, it is a mixed bag. Clearly Bill Clinton showed that a governor can provide great guidance in taking a failed republican economy and turning a huge deficit into a surplus, unparalleled economic growth for the country, keeping the country out of foreign entanglements while maintaining an effective military, while on the other hand, Bush showed us that a governor can be an unmitigated disaster, turning a huge surplus into a record deficit, taking a country having low unemployment into a country with disastrously high unemployment, taking an economy that was rocking for everyone into a stagnant economy during most of his presidency ending with a disaster of an economy, involving the country into two foreign wars at a cost of trillions of dollars and huge loss of american lives and limbs. So it depends upon the governor.

I do think personal involvement for 12 years in the governorship of a state, 8 years personal involvement of one of the more successful presidencies in history, a term in the Senate and four years of secretary state, personally meeting with most foreign heads of state and close understanding of the nation's foreign affairs is one of the more impressive resumes.

Yes, plus Hillary stood by her man! Despite his cheating ways. Nominate her for POTUS! She deserves it.

FredHayek wrote: Yes, plus Hillary stood by her man! Despite his cheating ways. Nominate her for POTUS! She deserves it.

Really? You had to go there? That is all that you have? If you want to go there, then we can talk about Jeb's wife's shopping habits and his daugher's drug habits, Walker's nazi lingerie debauchery, Rand's sons arrest, Christie (where do you start),etc.

Oh, I have plenty on Hillary, corruption, pay to play, taking down those who get in her way.

Really sad that you can not promote your own choices, all you have is to repeat the zombie lies that have no basis to denigrate others.