Broncos have a chance of winning this ballgame

VL, you know that is not true. Get off the Tebow thing. This is a defense playing zone again!!!! Fox is stupid. You heard what I thought they should do and they didn't do it. He didn't learn a thing.

The Patriots have averaged 40 points a game in the last 3 games, the Broncos have averaged 15...These teams are playing true to form tonight...So

This was to be expected CG

Don't talk down to me. This is still fox's fault.

CinnamonGirl wrote: Don't talk down to me. This is still fox's fault.

Oh come on now..I'm trying to comfort you

There is no comfort in stupidity.

CinnamonGirl wrote: There is no comfort in stupidity.

Ok, I'll explain it to you then CG

CinnamonGirl wrote: VL, you know that is not true. Get off the Tebow thing. This is a defense playing zone again!!!! Fox is stupid. You heard what I thought they should do and they didn't do it. He didn't learn a thing.

Fox knows that if he rushes 7 Brady will complete every single pass for big gains and you don't play man to man on Tom Brady. Theres only one way to slow down the Patriot offense, and thats to keep the ball away from him with long scoring drives.. Unfortunatly because of our personal, (not mentioning any names) thats not possible.

Fox should have learned from the last game and taken a chance. VL, are telling me they should just do what they did last time? The teams that beat them rush. And you have to try something different when you lose the first time. Listen he is breezing through there anyway you should just hope to get to him a couple times. Fox doesn't know anything obviously

CinnamonGirl wrote: Fox should have learned from the last game and taken a chance. VL, are telling me they should just do what they did last time? The teams that beat them rush. And you have to try something different when you lose the first time. Listen he is breezing through there anyway you should just hope to get to him a couple times. Fox doesn't know anything obviously

Lol

You're being unreasonable CG.. He can only put 11 guys out there, you do the math-

"You need at least 6 guys back, probably 8 to cover Gronkowski, Welker, Branch, Henandez, Woodhead or Ochocinco. You can't leave anyone uncoverd and you really cant leave Welker and Grankowski single covered

and many times a good offense is your best defense, and because of Tebow we don't have a good balanced time consuming offense

I am not saying it again. You are wrong.

And if last week taught us anything it's that even Tim Tebow can get big plays if you don't put enough people back in coverage..

What you're suggesting is suicidal