You're the only one that played the race card. Do you now expect posters to seek your permission to post if it doesn't specifically meet the original thread subject per your opinion? I'll stick with the first amendment that you claim to value.
I did reply to the original post. I believe the teen would beat Michelle easily. She has been training for this and Michelle hasn't. But I also think Obama would do poorly. Unless you keep at it, you can lose your schooling quickly.
Besides Obama can't even remember whant the executive branch is supposed to do, execute the laws that Congress passes, like DOMA. (Sorry Holder and Barack won't even bother to defend that one.)
And Obama is forgetful, like forgetting to close Gitmo, get out of Iraq, forgetting to end the Bush tax cuts. How can you expect him to remember who is in line for the Presidency after Joe Biden?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
who knew that you could get crappy grades and still graduate magna cum laude from Harvard.....according to Harvard his grades were in the top 10% of his class..... the rest of the students must have been really stupid.
Nmysys wrote: Thanks Archer. Now can you prove that?
Of course not, you accept everything about Obama, but we don't.
Yeah right....I'm sure that Harvard is lying, then they cooked their history and their records to add Obama to the Magna cum Laud graduates and whoever actually was the president of the Harvard Law Review allowed his name to be removed and replaced by Obama.....ya know this is all public record.....who graduated with what degree and who was president of the law review. Or do you think that back then they knew he was going to run for president so they dummied up all these public documents?
He can just keep using the ones he held over from the "birther" silliness, and the "Bin Laden isn't really dead" silliness... He must have quite a collection by now.
Geeez. I go away for a few hours and this turns into another "show us your grades" thread? Get real.
Bachmann has made several mistakes, which are shown in the article I posted, that demonstrate she is not the brightest bulb in the closet. They aren't mistakes made when you're tired or make a mistatement, (like 57 states.) In Bachmanns case, they are deliberate ignorance in her written speeches. This 10th grade girl is embarrassed by Bachmann and wants to demonstrate to the country that not all women are as ignorant as the Congresswoman.
Anyone care to comment on that or are you all going to continue the Obama slime fest?
LadyJazzer wrote: If that's the best you've got, thank you...
I simply called attention to SS109's race-card... But thanks for playing.
Of course, the thread is about BACHMANN... Perhaps they would like to comment on the original post?.......... Nah.
Talk about deflection, you still never explained how anyone here but yourself used the race card.....should be easy, even for you to show us the quote and explain your reasoning.
(waiting for the next deflection)
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Kate wrote: Geeez. I go away for a few hours and this turns into another "show us your grades" thread? Get real.
Bachmann has made several mistakes, which are shown in the article I posted, that demonstrate she is not the brightest bulb in the closet. They aren't mistakes made when you're tired or make a mistatement, (like 57 states.) In Bachmanns case, they are deliberate ignorance in her written speeches. This 10th grade girl is embarrassed by Bachmann and wants to demonstrate to the country that not all women are as ignorant as the Congresswoman.
Anyone care to comment on that or are you all going to continue the Obama slime fest?
I guarantee there are thousands of people that would love to debate Obama or any of the other Democrats that are clueless....does that mean that they should or would accept a challenge from some unknown just because they were challenged? It's just a silly "what if" premise.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
