archer wrote: Why isn't Arnold on the list.....he would be my number one choice.
Humm... good point. I guess because he wasn't discovered until after he left office, is no longer in politics, and faces no charges? But he could of been included still. I still wouldn't of put him in my top 3, though.
archer wrote: Why isn't Arnold on the list.....he would be my number one choice.
Humm... good point. I guess because he wasn't discovered until after he left office, is no longer in politics, and faces no charges? But he could of been included still. I still wouldn't of put him in my top 3, though.
Really? What could possibly be sleazier than cheating on your beautiful wife with a household employee....having a child with that employee...and keeping your mistress employed in the home you share with your wife?
archer wrote: Really? What could possibly be sleazier than cheating on your beautiful wife with a household employee....having a child with that employee...and keeping your mistress employed in the home you share with your wife?
John Edwards.
What could possibly be sleazier than cheating on your beautiful wife
CHECK! And a dying wife as well. Also many others in the poll meet that criteria of cheating on your wife.
with a household employee
CHECK! Not a household employee, but an employee.
having a child with that employee
CHECK!
and keeping your mistress employed in the home you share with your wife
CHECK on keeping mistress employed. But not in home. And possibly illegally using campaign funds to keep mistress secret. Facing a trial.
But OK, you win in that he should be on the poll. I just didn't want to reset the poll again, and I honestly forgot Ahhnuld.
My top 2 still include the major felony guys in William Jefferson and Duke Cunningham. And John Edwards may be even worse. Plus, why is Charles Rangel still in office?
Talk about a target rich enviroment. I chose Spitzer because he was quite the hypocrite, coming down hard on prostitution in NY State while he visited call girls in DC.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
SS109 wrote: Talk about a target rich enviroment. I chose Spitzer because he was quite the hypocrite, coming down hard on prostitution in NY State while he visited call girls in DC.
Spitzer can't be all that sleazy because CNN gave him his own show. So is CNN sleazy or just morally bankrupt?
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
No more so than the radio stations that gave convicted Watergate criminal, G. Gordon Liddy, and almost-convicted criminal, Ollie North their own shows... I thought that was pretty morally bankrupt too... (If we're using "having a show on a radio/tv channel" as some sort of criteria to judge sleaziness...)
