Okay, so does everyone understand what the debt ceiling really is?
back "in the day", Congress used to have to approve every single item for payment one at a time, it got to be too much to run every little thing by them each time; so in 1939, they started aggregating the debts to be approved by a cap, or debt ceiling - that's why we have this "ceremonial" vote. The spending was already approved IN THE PAST by CONGRESS. This ceiling is just saying we now have exceeded what the debt ceiling has been approved at and we need to raise it so that we can PAY OUR DEBTS. If people want to get pissed off about the debt ceiling, then they need to go after their own congressmen/women for spending that money IN THE PAST.
This debt ceiling vote is all for show - for the camera. No one is going to let the US Gov't default on it's bills.
Then the real focus needs to be on SPENDING and REVENUE. The wars are meaningless now.
you want to really get mad?
Among The Costs Of War: Billions A Year In A.C.?
http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2011/06/25/ac.jpg?t=1309037126&s=2
Air conditioners keep tents cool on a U.S. military base in Iraq. The tents have been treated with polyurethane foam to increase energy efficiency.
The amount the U.S. military spends annually on air conditioning in Iraq and Afghanistan:
$20.2 billion,
according to a former Pentagon official.
That's more than NASA's budget. It's more than BP has paid so far for damage from the Gulf oil spill. It's what the G-8 has pledged to help foster new democracies in Egypt and Tunisia.
"When you consider the cost to deliver the fuel to some of the most isolated places in the world — escorting, command and control, medevac support — when you throw all that infrastructure in, we're talking over $20 billion," Steven Anderson tells weekends on All Things Considered guest host Rachel Martin. He's a retired brigadier general who served as chief logistician for Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq. He's now in the private sector, selling technologies branded as energy-efficient to the Defense Department.
Now it's important to note that wrapped up in Anderson's $20 billion figure are all kind of other expenditures – for instance, the cost of building and maintaining roads in Afghanistan, securing those roads, managing the security operations for those roads. That all costs a lot of money and is part of the overall war effort in Afghanistan.
The Pentagon rejects Anderson's estimate. Still his claims raise questions about how much the US footprint in Afghanistan really costs – especially something like air conditioning.
read more...
http://www.npr.org/2011/06/25/137414737 ... nditioning