Fox News: "Don't Remember' Any Terrorist Attacks / Bush Watc

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Hey,,, al ya gotta be is pretty.

I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear

agreed, TV news "reporters" are nothing more than models for the most part these days. No real "reporting" going on

Wily Fox aka Angela wrote:

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Hey,,, al ya gotta be is pretty.

I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear

agreed, TV news "reporters" are nothing more than models for the most part these days. No real "reporting" going on

Very true, on CNN, the reporters just take their stories from the DNC wire.

I think we have to figure out how to protect REAL REPORTERS that are out there digging up and reporting facts; else we all get fooled (again). The problem is that too many special interests have their hands in the pie.

My home page has "widget/gadgets news" from :
BBC News
AL JAZEERA ENGLISH NEWS
NEW YORK TIMES
USATODAY
CNN
NPR
DISCOVERY NEWS
TECHNOLOGY NEWS
TIME
THE ONION (well, you know. . .)

in some attempt to get news from different angles to try to weed out the nonsense and find the facts.

SS109 wrote:

Wily Fox aka Angela wrote:

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Hey,,, al ya gotta be is pretty.

I just have to look good, I don't have to be clear

agreed, TV news "reporters" are nothing more than models for the most part these days. No real "reporting" going on

Very true, on CNN, the reporters just take their stories from the DNC wire.

They have to... Fox has the RNC wire all tied up...

I can't even believe this is a topic. There are lots of attempts that are made every year that we as the public do not even hear about. If there was a need to know then the public gets told otherwise the attempts are stopped before anything happens. It happens all the time regardless of who the president is.

It's a topic because the ORIGINAL topic was about the fact that the bozos on FauxNews (all 4 of them...I'm sure the liberal knew better) sat there and let the Kool-Aid drinker say he "Didn't remember any terrorist attacks between 2000 and 2008..."

Once you remember that, and throw the rest of the deflection in the trash where it belongs, it becomes very clear why it was a topic.

Of course the illiberals have certitude that the "Kool-Aid drinker" was referring to the entire time period and not post 9/11. Benefit of a doubt? To a conservative? Don't be ridickerous - we're talking illiberals here.

PrintSmith wrote: Of course the illiberals have certitude that the "Kool-Aid drinker" was referring to the entire time period and not post 9/11. Benefit of a doubt? To a conservative? Don't be ridickerous - we're talking illiberals here.

I dunno PS....have you ever....ever...... given the benefit of the doubt to Obama? no.....I didn't think so. Don't expect to get what you are unwilling to give.

I'm sorry... Did you miss it the first time around?

"America was certainly safe between 2000 and 2008," he said. "I don't remember any attacks on American soil during that period of time." Nobody on the panel challenged this comment.


Is this anything like the "benefit of the doubt" with the 57 states comment?

Nah.... This Kool-Aid drinker said it, and NO ONE on the panel challenged it.

archer wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Of course the illiberals have certitude that the "Kool-Aid drinker" was referring to the entire time period and not post 9/11. Benefit of a doubt? To a conservative? Don't be ridickerous - we're talking illiberals here.

I dunno PS....have you ever....ever...... given the benefit of the doubt to Obama? no.....I didn't think so. Don't expect to get what you are unwilling to give.

I give him the benefit of the doubt every day archer, if I didn't I would be spending all my time wondering how someone that ignorant managed to be elected president. I gave him the benefit of the doubt about his visiting 57 states with only a couple more to go. I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he incorrectly asserted his mother spent her dying days fighting with an insurance company over her medical care. I gave him the benefit of the doubt regarding his statements about doctors choosing to remove tonsils from children, or amputate the feet of diabetics, because it was more profitable for them than treating their condition without resorting to surgery. I have given him a pass on most all of his blatantly false demagoguery from the day he was inaugurated.