The logic of the Libs in Wisconsin

LadyJazzer wrote: Which has exactly WHAT to do with the fact that he's been altering posts and lying?

neptunechimney wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: Like I'm surprised that "thousands" of Ditto-heads and Kool-aid drinkers would take what he says as gospel...

Sorry, I'm over the age where I need something like FB to make myself feel important...

The democratic stategeries are so much better.

Science Chic wrote:

The Viking wrote:

archer wrote:

The Viking wrote: LJ's lies again. I source 99% of the time. .

Really? Lately you have been posting lies and no sources.....and rewriting peoples posts so you can lie about that. You need to do some serious work on rebuilding your posting reputation, if that is even possible now.

My reputation is stellar with everyone but about 6 people on here. And do I care when I have thousands on FB who read my posts daily? Not in the least. Your little jabs don't get to me archer. But you can keep trying with nothing else to be excited aobut this next eleciton, you have to find something to entertain you.

And what was wrong with me exchanging Clinton with Republican Congress? It was all exactly the same. But libe have no commone sense, no sense of reality, and no sense of humor.

Neptune, this is how Facebook works: you sign up for an account, then start searching for people you know. When you do, you click on the Add a Friend button and it sends them a message asking them if they want to be your friend. When they say yes, you both have access to each other's profile page - the info that you input about yourself, pictures, posts you make, etc. You can set the privacy to only people you've friended, or wide open to the public. Then when you log in, you see all of your friend's recent posts, or posts that have the most recent activity. You can send messages, or IM while you're both logged on.

Viking may have "thousands" who've friended him, but of the trend that I've noticed in my friends, only about 2/3 of them are regularly on FB - the rest signed up, played a while, then quit, or check in only once in a blue moon. Of those, only about 1/4 to 1/3 post every day or reply - the rest are passive readers and you can't tell whether they agree with you or not. And of his friends, most certainly didn't friend him just to read his political posts, and while they may be reading them, they absolutely do not all agree with him 100%.

What was wrong with your altering another's posters quote? It's impersonation for one, which isn't permitted. It was not exactly the same or it wouldn't have been pulled - a "quote", by definition, should be exactly what the person said, even taking a few sentences out of context to change their meaning is suspect. Second, you may think it's funny, but no one else does - it's really in poor taste - address the points the poster made in a respectful manner, rather than avoid the issue by changing their words and acting snarky (and as I recall you complained about VL doing the same thing, so yes, you do know better). And yes, your credibility is a little suspect when your post is shown to be wrong and you never come back to admit it, or you duck direct questions.

Science Chic wrote:

Sunshine Girl wrote: Wow, that tropical heat did something to you huh SC! rofllol :woo hoo: rofllol Ok, I have no idea what Viking altered, but if he did alter someone's quote then he's IN BIG TROUBLE! JK Viking, you know I love you BUT messing with Archer or LJ is going to get your a** toasted. AND don't even think of messing with SC! This is a tough group of ladies (I am humbled by them) so watch yourself young man! rofllol Ok. I'm done messing around. Have a great day guys.

No, the issue has been resolved so he's not in trouble. And everyone is free to discuss policy and how it's been applied to them - we apply the rules equally and fairly, and are more than willing to discuss the decisions we make with posters as dialog is much more agreeable than commands from on high. If there's a reasonable argument that policy was not applied fairly, we are certainly open to listening and changing our decision; otherwise, yes we stand firm on our actions.

Science Chic wrote:

Sunshine Girl wrote: I was just kidding around SC, but I it kinda turned me on to see you so feisty!

:thumbsup: Well, he did need to be taken down a peg, thinking he's All That and a Bag of Chips just cuz he has so many friends/acquaintances!

I just don't want anyone thinking that I'm making any decisions based on emotions/vendettas/personal issues - I'm not. Yes, I'm on vacation, and having to Referee here still takes time out of my day, but I have great help, and my family is totally okay with me working a bit (I feel bad I didn't get to the weekly Weekend Events post though, sorry about that). I'm glad I have a job that I can do from anywhere, and the kids are happy to be in a pool with Mom watching and playing on her laptop! As long as they're not drowning, I'm good! tongue: The view looking up from my laptop is certainly better than the view of the wall back home!

LadyJazzer wrote: Which has exactly WHAT to do with the fact that he's been altering posts and lying?

Wow... A graph from: The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation...


You can hear the surprise in *MY* voice....