Chris Christie chokes , I assume on a ham sandwich

PrintSmith wrote:

AspenValley wrote: Why do the Republicans keep demanding Obama "create jobs" when they insist the government can't create jobs?

We're simply pressuring the statists that currently occupy the executive branch to prove their assertion that the government can, in fact, create jobs that are not government jobs. Republicans know that the government can't create jobs in the private sector, but the consistent demagogic cry from the left is that the Republicans are not creating the jobs they promised in 2010. Since it is Democrats, and not Republicans, who claim that the government creates jobs it is therefore quite appropriate to ask them to produce the results that match their claims.

So now you're saying the Republicans who were elected on promises of "jobs, jobs, jobs" did so under false premises?

SS109 wrote:
President Barack promised unemployment below 8% but the nation is still sitting at 9.2%.

Oh! He predicted 8.0% and it's 9.2%, impeach him!

You guys gave us 2 needless 3 trilllion dollar (and counting) wars, and 12 trillion in debt and you wanna lynch Obama because he was off by 1% on his prediction?

GFY

PrintSmith wrote:

AspenValley wrote: Why do the Republicans keep demanding Obama "create jobs" when they insist the government can't create jobs?

We're simply pressuring the statists that currently occupy the executive branch to prove their assertion that the government can, in fact, create jobs that are not government jobs. Republicans know that the government can't create jobs in the private sector, but the consistent demagogic cry from the left is that the Republicans are not creating the jobs they promised in 2010. Since it is Democrats, and not Republicans, who claim that the government creates jobs it is therefore quite appropriate to ask them to produce the results that match their claims.

Oh....but it IS the Republicans/tea party that ran on jobs, jobs, jobs in 2010. Were they also talking about government jobs?

What's the topic of this thread? Oh ya, VL wants someone to die...very progressive of you asshole.

CriticalBill wrote: What's the topic of this thread? Oh ya, VL wants someone to die...very progressive of you asshole.

You don't think cutting people off from access to healthcare results in some deaths?

Christies a pig

AspenValley wrote:

PrintSmith wrote:

AspenValley wrote: Why do the Republicans keep demanding Obama "create jobs" when they insist the government can't create jobs?

We're simply pressuring the statists that currently occupy the executive branch to prove their assertion that the government can, in fact, create jobs that are not government jobs. Republicans know that the government can't create jobs in the private sector, but the consistent demagogic cry from the left is that the Republicans are not creating the jobs they promised in 2010. Since it is Democrats, and not Republicans, who claim that the government creates jobs it is therefore quite appropriate to ask them to produce the results that match their claims.

So now you're saying the Republicans who were elected on promises of "jobs, jobs, jobs" did so under false premises?

archer wrote: Oh....but it IS the Republicans/tea party that ran on jobs, jobs, jobs in 2010. Were they also talking about government jobs?

Must have hit a nerve, eh? The did indeed run on a platform of jobs, jobs, jobs. And the Cut, Cap and Balance, which Reid tabled to give Obama cover rather than debate and amend with a looming default facing the nation, would create that job friendly environment for the private sector to create those jobs. Repeal of ObamaCare would help create that job friendly environment as well. All the Republicans can do at this point is pass bills in the one house of Congress that they control that fulfill the promises they made to "focus" on jobs, as opposed to the promise made by Democrats to "create" them. The Republicans in the House are fulfilling their promise to "focus" on jobs, how are those Democrats doing on theirs to "create" them?

Vice Lord wrote: Firstly- Who eats a ham sandwich for breakfest, and secondly how can a person manage a state or a country if he can't manage to stop eating food? Hopefully he'll die like Mama Cass. I know that sounds bad, but if you add up all the misery he's created for people in New Jersey, and all the people who have died due to lack of adequate healhthcare in his state due to his policies..He more than deserves it

Did you just make up a story for your own benefit? No link at all becaue you know it was a total lie! Where did you come up with the Ham Sandwich? Having fantasies about pigs again?

Here is the REAL story. NEVER belive ANYTHING VL posts. He has been proven to be the biggest liar on here.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/0 ... hospi.html

Gov. Chris Christie was hospitalized this morning after he complained of having trouble breathing, according to the governor's office.

A spokesman, Michael Drewniak, said Christie suffers from asthma , and was taken to Somerset Medical Center in Somerville "out of an abundance of caution."

oops.....sounds like VL has been taking posting lessons from Viking

:rofl

archer wrote: oops.....sounds like VL has been taking posting lessons from Viking

:rofl

ummmmm..... ok? That makes sense? Get back on the meds archer......

PrintSmith wrote:

AspenValley wrote:

PrintSmith wrote:

AspenValley wrote: Why do the Republicans keep demanding Obama "create jobs" when they insist the government can't create jobs?

We're simply pressuring the statists that currently occupy the executive branch to prove their assertion that the government can, in fact, create jobs that are not government jobs. Republicans know that the government can't create jobs in the private sector, but the consistent demagogic cry from the left is that the Republicans are not creating the jobs they promised in 2010. Since it is Democrats, and not Republicans, who claim that the government creates jobs it is therefore quite appropriate to ask them to produce the results that match their claims.

So now you're saying the Republicans who were elected on promises of "jobs, jobs, jobs" did so under false premises?

archer wrote: Oh....but it IS the Republicans/tea party that ran on jobs, jobs, jobs in 2010. Were they also talking about government jobs?

Must have hit a nerve, eh? The did indeed run on a platform of jobs, jobs, jobs. And the Cut, Cap and Balance, which Reid tabled to give Obama cover rather than debate and amend with a looming default facing the nation, would create that job friendly environment for the private sector to create those jobs. Repeal of ObamaCare would help create that job friendly environment as well. All the Republicans can do at this point is pass bills in the one house of Congress that they control that fulfill the promises they made to "focus" on jobs, as opposed to the promise made by Democrats to "create" them. The Republicans in the House are fulfilling their promise to "focus" on jobs, how are those Democrats doing on theirs to "create" them?

Hit a nerve? Hit on an all-too-obvious hypocrisy, you mean.

Do you ever tire of being so disingenuous?

The Tea Party candidates DID run on a "jobs, jobs, jobs" campaign and they didn't put out disclaimers saying what they really "meant" was that by electing them it would not really PRODUCE any jobs, it would only somehow allow them to "focus" on jobs.

I think the voters know the difference and aren't happy that not only aren't these clowns PRODUCING any jobs, they aren't even FOCUSING on jobs. They are focusing on hanging on to tax cuts for millionaires.