TEA PARTY TERRORISTS

Who hates government AV? A government of proper size and scope is a blessing and a guarantee of personal liberty. One of improper size and scope is a curse instead of a blessing. One entity governing everything has consistently been shown to be ultimately harmful to the rights and liberties of the individuals living under it. Take the current debt for instance. Someone is going to have to eventually pay all that money back, and it certainly isn't going to be the ones who borrowed it and gained benefit from borrowing it. Pretty selfish of them, don't you think?

PrintSmith wrote: Who hates government AV?

Do you really want a list?

PrintSmith wrote: Someone is going to have to eventually pay all that money back, and it certainly isn't going to be the ones who borrowed it and gained benefit from borrowing it. Pretty selfish of them, don't you think?

Absolutely, which is why we need to let the tax cuts for the wealthy expire and close the tax loopholes that allow big corps to make windfall profits and pay very low taxes. They have benefitted too long from the borrowing of money to support them when they did not need supporting.

Great idea PS.

PrintSmith wrote: Who hates government AV? A government of proper size and scope is a blessing and a guarantee of personal liberty. One of improper size and scope is a curse instead of a blessing. One entity governing everything has consistently been shown to be ultimately harmful to the rights and liberties of the individuals living under it. Take the current debt for instance. Someone is going to have to eventually pay all that money back, and it certainly isn't going to be the ones who borrowed it and gained benefit from borrowing it. Pretty selfish of them, don't you think?

Yes, there is a proper balance. It has been abused way out of control. Look at the other thread I just posted about how Obama and this administration just proposed and finalized 608 new government job killing regulations JUST IN JULY!! For a total of $9.5 Billion more in red tape!

archer wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Someone is going to have to eventually pay all that money back, and it certainly isn't going to be the ones who borrowed it and gained benefit from borrowing it. Pretty selfish of them, don't you think?

Absolutely, which is why we need to let the tax cuts for the wealthy expire and close the tax loopholes that allow big corps to make windfall profits and pay very low taxes. They have benefitted too long from the borrowing of money to support them when they did not need supporting.

Great idea PS.

You Kool Aid drinkers are like a broken record. You will never understand economics. You keep repeating that it should mostly be on the shoulders of those who are already paying almost 40% of our entire revenue to fix our economy. You want to raise taxes to add to our revenue maybe 2% more. THAT is your big strategy? Why can't you people understand that at least 95% of our problem is SPENDING!! :bash :bash

The Viking wrote:

archer wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Someone is going to have to eventually pay all that money back, and it certainly isn't going to be the ones who borrowed it and gained benefit from borrowing it. Pretty selfish of them, don't you think?

Absolutely, which is why we need to let the tax cuts for the wealthy expire and close the tax loopholes that allow big corps to make windfall profits and pay very low taxes. They have benefitted too long from the borrowing of money to support them when they did not need supporting.

Great idea PS.

You Kool Aid drinkers are like a broken record. You will never understand economics. You keep repeating that it should mostly be on the shoulders of those who are already paying almost 40% of our entire revenue to fix our economy. You want to raise taxes to add to our revenue maybe 2% more. THAT is your big strategy? Why can't you people understand that at least 95% of our problem is SPENDING!! :bash :bash

You flat out can't read.....or you choose not to read, what is posted. No one.....NOT ONE lefty has posted that this should be "mostly on the shoulders of those who are paying almost 40%".....no one Viking, not one person.....
What I want is to bring in almost any revenue we can to add to the spending cuts to bring down our deficit faster.
Yes we have a spending problem, yes we have to cut spending, but as we are seeing so clearly now, cutting spending WILL NOT be enough. We need to increase revenue, and until we do we are putting a very small band-aid on a very large wound. The rest of the world recognizes our folly.......the liberals recognize our folly, but the conservatives recognize nothing.....they just keep on keeping on doing the same sh*t over and over again and get the same worthless results. What a bunch of fools. Tax cuts and spending cuts alone will NOT get us out of this mess.

:bash

PrintSmith wrote: Who hates government AV? A government of proper size and scope is a blessing and a guarantee of personal liberty. One of improper size and scope is a curse instead of a blessing. One entity governing everything has consistently been shown to be ultimately harmful to the rights and liberties of the individuals living under it. Take the current debt for instance. Someone is going to have to eventually pay all that money back, and it certainly isn't going to be the ones who borrowed it and gained benefit from borrowing it. Pretty selfish of them, don't you think?

I don't think you even knew what the word debt meant until FOX news told you to be upset about it 6 months ago.

And Furthermore-You Peckerwoods keep saying that just like your families the government has to balance its budget..Then you take out 1rst and 2nd mortages, car loans and credit cards debt. Debt is not the problem- Jobs and consumer demand is and your New Bill just killed that.

Have fun Explaining that in o 12

AspenValley wrote: Electing people to government who hate government is kind of like choosing an athiest for your minister.

And in both cases, you will get what you deserve.

Hiring people for goverment who think goverment is the solution for everything leads to massive overspending.

I prefer a balance of each. And like a wave, right now the fiscal conservatives have more power. It could and may change back in 2012. But clearly the Dems need to "triangulate" like Clinton did after his second term. Will Obama continue to tack to the right?

SS109 wrote:

AspenValley wrote: Electing people to government who hate government is kind of like choosing an athiest for your minister.

And in both cases, you will get what you deserve.

Hiring people for goverment who think goverment is the solution for everything leads to massive overspending.

I prefer a balance of each. And like a wave, right now the fiscal conservatives have more power. It could and may change back in 2012. But clearly the Dems need to "triangulate" like Clinton did after his second term. Will Obama continue to tack to the right?

It changed..It changed with Scott Walker and the Republican governors attacking the Middle Class. It changed with this Terrorist hostage taking..Make no mistake Corky, It's changed.

78% of Americans wanna tax the rich while you whores protect them and coprorate walfare with your lives...And now your gonna die for that in the next election cycle