Interesting fued and tweet from Rumsfeld

I won't try and explain it. My OPINION is that you don't use 9/11 to say what he did. The day is to honor those who lost their lives not to jab at the opposition and make them look un american and uncaring. Using that day to do that is deplorable. I am not going to say anything else about it. If you don't think it is a feud then fine. Would it make more sense if I change the title?

His 'fake heroes' comment made him look jealous that he was not around or something when it happened. He is a d*ck. And to try and make me look stupid does not make sense. Archer, if "When you first read it, you thought, well that was stupid, and wanted to move on." Why did you not say that instead of your comment that you were confused by the feud of it.

archer wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

SS109 wrote: I am sure even most of the Libs on this site would disagree with Krugman on his column.

What?..It was brilliant...But I guess you're gonna call him a troll now huh? Krugmans just a troll..Don't listen to him everybody....He's just a troll

Right Archer?

Right what? you get to have your opinion too.

You always call me just a troll.

Just because Krugmans article got a big reaction, doersn't mean he's a troll

Vice Lord wrote:

You always call me just a troll.

I call you a troll when you are trolling.....

....hey, we're friends, if a friend can't call a friend a troll, who can?

Krugman weighs in again:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/12/more-about-the-911-anniversary/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto

I think his timing was a bit lousy for going to print on the 10th Anniversary. Would the September 10th or 12th been any better?

It is not news. He stated as much just after the attack happened.

From the 9/11/2011 article:

a time of exploitation and intimidation, culminating in the deliberate misleading of the nation into the invasion of Iraq.

Right on. IMO.

Shameful??? I disagree. i wrote in my recollection of 9/11 that I was worried this country would not come out of it and we did and there was heroism. So one post was not enough for the jerk. He is smart on some things but he is being an idiot to do this again and not allowing comments.

I would agree the Fake Heroes comment is also a bit much and yes, not allowing comments is weasel like.

Separate this political crap away from 9/11 what he is doing is denying the pain of people who lost loved ones on 9/11. IMO you don't do things like that on a day when we are in mourning. He should be ashamed of himself.

For those that lost someone as a result of the attacks, it will never be forgotten. Each deals with it in their own way. Curious how all the NATO nations were fooled into the war over there. Maybe those in charge know things the opinion piece writers don't.

You know what really pisses me off? when certain high and mighty liberals believe they have the market on caring about people and that they act like don't care about money. That only republicans care about money. Hypocrisy.

CinnamonGirl wrote: I won't try and explain it. My OPINION is that you don't use 9/11 to say what he did. The day is to honor those who lost their lives not to jab at the opposition and make them look un american and uncaring. Using that day to do that is deplorable. I am not going to say anything else about it. If you don't think it is a feud then fine. Would it make more sense if I change the title?

His 'fake heroes' comment made him look jealous that he was not around or something when it happened. He is a d*ck. And to try and make me look stupid does not make sense. Archer, if "When you first read it, you thought, well that was stupid, and wanted to move on." Why did you not say that instead of your comment that you were confused by the feud of it.

I WAS confused by the word feud.....that carries the connotation that they have been going back and forth on the issue and there is some kind of ongoing war of words. Since I could not find anything like that, I merely wondered if you knew more than I could find. Really? why do liberals always get bashed when they ask a question and then expect an answer?