GOP presidential candidate is a distraction

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

Isn't this what the libtard media was saying during the last election cycle? I guess when they say the lie over and over again...they believe it.

By the way, CNN scored big time with the GOP Tea Party debates. Ratings were an all time high for CNN....maybe CNN will take the hint.

residenttroll wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

Isn't this what the libtard media was saying during the last election cycle? I guess when they say the lie over and over again...they believe it.

By the way, CNN scored big time with the GOP Tea Party debates. Ratings were an all time high for CNN....maybe CNN will take the hint.

No surprise there....everyone loves to watch a train wreck.

archer wrote:

residenttroll wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

Isn't this what the libtard media was saying during the last election cycle? I guess when they say the lie over and over again...they believe it.

By the way, CNN scored big time with the GOP Tea Party debates. Ratings were an all time high for CNN....maybe CNN will take the hint.

No surprise there....everyone loves to watch a train wreck.

Then the Democrat debates will have sky high ratings.

archer wrote:

residenttroll wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

Isn't this what the libtard media was saying during the last election cycle? I guess when they say the lie over and over again...they believe it.

By the way, CNN scored big time with the GOP Tea Party debates. Ratings were an all time high for CNN....maybe CNN will take the hint.

No surprise there....everyone loves to watch a train wreck.

Then the Democrat debates will have sky high ratings.

archer wrote:

CriticalBill wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

It would be funny if the GOP candidates chew each other to pieces and Chris Christie waltzes in to take the nomination.

Seems to be with the same stats of Rs and Ds and how long has the Tea Party been around? Besides, it's still only a party in name and you have to admit, they did change the same old bs we've watched for decades now.

How really did they change the same old bs? So far all I have seen from the Tea Party is more of the same old bs, different names. They haven't been able to accomplish anything positive, just make the American people a little angrier, and the government less responsive and more grid locked then ever. Maybe that was the intent?

You would be singing quite a different toon if there was an oppposite movement that resulted from Obama's failed promises to liberals. If it was some sort of green or anti-war movement that got traction, forced more liberals to be liberals, and helped promote an agenda YOU aproved of, I think you would be behind that movement ....would you not?

CriticalBill wrote:

archer wrote:

CriticalBill wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

It would be funny if the GOP candidates chew each other to pieces and Chris Christie waltzes in to take the nomination.

Seems to be with the same stats of Rs and Ds and how long has the Tea Party been around? Besides, it's still only a party in name and you have to admit, they did change the same old bs we've watched for decades now.

How really did they change the same old bs? So far all I have seen from the Tea Party is more of the same old bs, different names. They haven't been able to accomplish anything positive, just make the American people a little angrier, and the government less responsive and more grid locked then ever. Maybe that was the intent?

You would be singing quite a different toon if there was an oppposite movement that resulted from Obama's failed promises to liberals. If it was some sort of green or anti-war movement that got traction, forced more liberals to be liberals, and helped promote an agenda YOU aproved of, I think you would be behind that movement ....would you not?

Not sure what that question has to do with what I posted......but thanks again for telling me what I would do or what "toon" (sic) I would be singing. I am not particularly on the green or anti-war bandwagon......although it's sounding like some of the conservatives have gotten on the latter.

archer wrote:

CriticalBill wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

It would be funny if the GOP candidates chew each other to pieces and Chris Christie waltzes in to take the nomination.

Seems to be with the same stats of Rs and Ds and how long has the Tea Party been around? Besides, it's still only a party in name and you have to admit, they did change the same old bs we've watched for decades now.

How really did they change the same old bs? So far all I have seen from the Tea Party is more of the same old bs, different names. They haven't been able to accomplish anything positive, just make the American people a little angrier, and the government less responsive and more grid locked then ever. Maybe that was the intent?

The TEA Party isn't in power. They did take a lot of seats, but they are still in the minority. Harry Reid hasn't even allowed their budget bill to be voted on in the Senate. Is he too scared that it will pass?

Then again Harry Reid hasn't submitted Obama's "Jobs" bill to the Senate either. Is he part of the gridlock too?

SS109 wrote:

archer wrote:

CriticalBill wrote:

Wayn-O wrote: Just 28 percent of Americans hold favorable views of the tea party, an all-time low.

It would be funny if the GOP candidates chew each other to pieces and Chris Christie waltzes in to take the nomination.

Seems to be with the same stats of Rs and Ds and how long has the Tea Party been around? Besides, it's still only a party in name and you have to admit, they did change the same old bs we've watched for decades now.

How really did they change the same old bs? So far all I have seen from the Tea Party is more of the same old bs, different names. They haven't been able to accomplish anything positive, just make the American people a little angrier, and the government less responsive and more grid locked then ever. Maybe that was the intent?

The TEA Party isn't in power. They did take a lot of seats, but they are still in the minority. Harry Reid hasn't even allowed their budget bill to be voted on in the Senate. Is he too scared that it will pass?

Then again Harry Reid hasn't submitted Obama's "Jobs" bill to the Senate either. Is he part of the gridlock too?

I thought that was the point.....the two parties have been locked in an ideological struggle, with no progress being made for years......add the Tea Party and what has changed? nothing. They are all politicians, and it seems now that ideology has taken precedence over what is good for the country. Once that happens how can we expect anything BUT grid lock? There is no longer any incentive to compromise and do what is right for the nation. It's all about party.

archer wrote: [They are all politicians, and it seems now that ideology has taken precedence over what is good for the country. Once that happens how can we expect anything BUT grid lock? There is no longer any incentive to compromise and do what is right for the nation. It's all about party.

The Tea Party believes that their ideology IS what is good for the country and has nothing to do with party.

Each party believes their ideology IS what is good for the country. That's nothing new.