I suspect there's more to this story (and a cover story that will come out if Holder has to answer for this operation); If Holder is made to testify I'm guessing there will be a rush of comparisons between this scandal and Iran-Contra. I can hear it now, "...it's not the first time the US Government provided weapons to controversial organizations..." Maybe not, but it's the first incident I'm aware of that the US Government provided weapons to Mexican drug cartels.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
CriticalBill wrote: Any liberal want to comment on the actual topic, or is personal bickering all you got?
Serious? Have you SEEN the libs on here? They have no actual discussion skills. I wouldn't hold your breath. This is a criminal action at best! He totally lied to congress. It is Perjury 101. And Obama knew too. They set up Americans to be killed and knew it and tried to hide it. The new papers they found only prove that Holder knew over a year ago and was kept up on it many times but he flat out lied and said he only found out about it a few weeks ago.
How much do you guys want to bet that all the libs on here read and will respond to is my first few sentences. They know obama and holden are criminals and won't discuss it.
If he lied, I'm sure Congress will take actions against him, as they have other AG's who have lied.
What will have to be proven is that Holder saw the memos in question. It's like mailing a letter. You can prove it was mailed, but can you prove it was read?
I'll wait for the facts to come out in a court of law and let justice take its course.
This reminds me of the Iran Contra Affair that Reagan skated on...
Conservative Voice wrote: If he lied, I'm sure Congress will take actions against him, as they have other AG's who have lied.
What will have to be proven is that Holder saw the memos in question. It's like mailing a letter. You can prove it was mailed, but can you prove it was read?
I'll wait for the facts to come out in a court of law and let justice take its course.
This reminds me of the Iran Contra Affair that Reagan skated on...
Good point. I get more than 100 e-mails a day and you can bet I ignore most of them. And the ones I do read often aren't acted on. Plus you have to figure if the ATF is telling you about their crimes, they are going to try and describe them in ways that gloss over the damage.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Conservative Voice wrote: If he lied, I'm sure Congress will take actions against him, as they have other AG's who have lied.
What will have to be proven is that Holder saw the memos in question. It's like mailing a letter. You can prove it was mailed, but can you prove it was read?
I'll wait for the facts to come out in a court of law and let justice take its course.
This reminds me of the Iran Contra Affair that Reagan skated on...
If he didn't know, HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. What's going on in the DOJ if Holder had know idea what was going on? Porn?
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.