Eighteen things that critics are saying about Rick Perry

jmc wrote:

archer wrote: Why isn't Huntsman getting any traction? He seems well spoken, smart, has lots of foreign affairs experience, plus governing experience. What is it about him that the GOP doesn't like? I think he would appeal to a broad range of voters,which is still necessary to win a national election.

Because the hard right want to be pure and are willing to lose and nominate a whack. We all lose.

Other than his married life, do you think Newt is a whack? He is by far the most intelligent in both parties.

The Viking wrote:

jmc wrote:

archer wrote: Why isn't Huntsman getting any traction? He seems well spoken, smart, has lots of foreign affairs experience, plus governing experience. What is it about him that the GOP doesn't like? I think he would appeal to a broad range of voters,which is still necessary to win a national election.

Because the hard right want to be pure and are willing to lose and nominate a whack. We all lose.

Other than his merried life, do you think Newt is a whack? He is by far the most intelligent in both parties.

newt is smart but has too much baggage to be a serious candidate.

The Viking wrote:

jmc wrote:

archer wrote: Why isn't Huntsman getting any traction? He seems well spoken, smart, has lots of foreign affairs experience, plus governing experience. What is it about him that the GOP doesn't like? I think he would appeal to a broad range of voters,which is still necessary to win a national election.

Because the hard right want to be pure and are willing to lose and nominate a whack. We all lose.

Other than his merried life, do you think Newt is a whack? He is by far the most intelligent in both parties.

I would think that his married life would be indicative of the kind of man he is. What are your issues with Huntsman viking?

jmc wrote:

The Viking wrote:

jmc wrote:

archer wrote: Why isn't Huntsman getting any traction? He seems well spoken, smart, has lots of foreign affairs experience, plus governing experience. What is it about him that the GOP doesn't like? I think he would appeal to a broad range of voters,which is still necessary to win a national election.

Because the hard right want to be pure and are willing to lose and nominate a whack. We all lose.

Other than his merried life, do you think Newt is a whack? He is by far the most intelligent in both parties.

newt is smart but has too much baggage to be a serious candidate.

Fixed my typo on married by the way.

And what baggage other than the affair? And that was over 15 years ago. And he is polling in third in a few polls and a few states now. And he just came in a pretty close third in the Nevada straw poll. He gains every debate. And now that Fax added 2 more, he has 5 more polls to gain. Still think he would be a fantastic VP if he doesn't win.

archer wrote:

The Viking wrote:

jmc wrote:

archer wrote: Why isn't Huntsman getting any traction? He seems well spoken, smart, has lots of foreign affairs experience, plus governing experience. What is it about him that the GOP doesn't like? I think he would appeal to a broad range of voters,which is still necessary to win a national election.

Because the hard right want to be pure and are willing to lose and nominate a whack. We all lose.

Other than his merried life, do you think Newt is a whack? He is by far the most intelligent in both parties.

I would think that his married life would be indicative of the kind of man he is. What are your issues with Huntsman viking?

Not according to how you guys kept supporting Clinton after his affairs and lying to congress. So it shouldn't matter with Newt right?

The Viking wrote:

archer wrote:

The Viking wrote:

jmc wrote:

archer wrote: Why isn't Huntsman getting any traction? He seems well spoken, smart, has lots of foreign affairs experience, plus governing experience. What is it about him that the GOP doesn't like? I think he would appeal to a broad range of voters,which is still necessary to win a national election.

Because the hard right want to be pure and are willing to lose and nominate a whack. We all lose.

Other than his merried life, do you think Newt is a whack? He is by far the most intelligent in both parties.

I would think that his married life would be indicative of the kind of man he is. What are your issues with Huntsman viking?

Not according to how you guys kept supporting Clinton after his affairs and lying to congress. So it shouldn't matter with Newt right?

So you are saying that Newt's issues with his marriages shouldn't matter to conservatives because Clinton's didn't matter to Democrats. Not sure I follow that logic, but I'll take your word for it.

So.....what about Huntsman?

It seems that a lot of democrats really like Huntsman. Maybe they should nominate him...

towermonkey wrote: It seems that a lot of democrats really like Huntsman. Maybe they should nominate him...

Never happen, if Democrats, or even independents, like him there there must be something terribly wrong with him.

archer wrote:

towermonkey wrote: It seems that a lot of democrats really like Huntsman. Maybe they should nominate him...

Never happen, if Democrats, or even independents, like him there there must be something terribly wrong with him.

She didn't get what you were saying TM

The Viking wrote:

archer wrote:

towermonkey wrote: It seems that a lot of democrats really like Huntsman. Maybe they should nominate him...

Never happen, if Democrats, or even independents, like him there there must be something terribly wrong with him.

She didn't get what you were saying TM

We already have a candidate viking.