Revolt! Now Democrats want Obama off ballot

neptunechimney wrote:

Dr Philban wrote: [No results from World Net Daily are startling. Anything... from articles to polls to most of the advertising on World Net Daily carries a margin of error of 100 percent... plus or minus nothing. World Net Daily is the World Wide News of conservative politics. If they could find a way to work Bat Boy into an article, they would. This would be no different than "The Nation" publishing a poll that says the majority of conservatives hates blacks. Sorry Charlie...

Be that as it may, this story is based in fact. You must not listen too progressive radio or you would know that. It is not going to happen because the left will not take that risk with their black voter block but they do talk about it. I believe it is an attempt to push Obama more left. OTOH, it might just be self serving political posturing.

Be that as it may... World Nut Daily is not a legitimate source of truthful information. I do listen to progressive radio. Progressive radio is not any different than far-right radio, it does not represent the majority of Democrats or the political left. Listening to Bill Press, Thom Hartmann, Sirota, Ed Schultz etal is equivalent to listening to Stormfront and other far right wingnuts. If you are using that as your truth guide, you've been fooled.

LadyJazzer wrote: Gee, every time I think the rightwing slime can't sink any lower, they surprise me... I'd rate them on the evolutionary scale between anthrax and pond-scum...(with apologies to pond-scum...)

Gee.. is this the intellectual height of your debating skills? Honestly, I know 8 graders who could discuss these topics with more acumen then you can. How do you come up will these laconic pronouncements? It's like you have short-term-argumentation skills. You attempt to refute a topic, put your fingers on the keyboard and then before you know it, you've produced some meaningless dribble. Maybe you'll be lucky some day. The laws of averages dictate that if you keep flapping your mouth long enough, you may actually say something meaningful.

Making friends is not high on your list huh?

towermonkey wrote: Making friends is not high on your list huh?

I have friends. I don't get along with socialist very well.

Considering I haven't heard one democrat, nor spoken to any of my democrat friends who wants Obama to be president again, this is not surprising. Most of my dem friends would like him to step down and let Hillary run. They won't vote for most republicans, of course, but they too can't imagine another 4 yrs like this.

RenegadeCJ wrote: Considering I haven't heard one democrat, nor spoken to any of my democrat friends who wants Obama to be president again, this is not surprising. Most of my dem friends would like him to step down and let Hillary run. They won't vote for most republicans, of course, but they too can't imagine another 4 yrs like this.

I would take Hillary over Obama. Won't change anything in DC, a GOP president wouldn't change anything in DC, they are all working for the same cronies.

Dr Philban wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote: Considering I haven't heard one democrat, nor spoken to any of my democrat friends who wants Obama to be president again, this is not surprising. Most of my dem friends would like him to step down and let Hillary run. They won't vote for most republicans, of course, but they too can't imagine another 4 yrs like this.

I would take Hillary over Obama. Won't change anything in DC, a GOP president wouldn't change anything in DC, they are all working for the same cronies.

If nothing would change, why on earth would you have a preference? You aren't making any sense again.

towermonkey wrote:

Dr Philban wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote: Considering I haven't heard one democrat, nor spoken to any of my democrat friends who wants Obama to be president again, this is not surprising. Most of my dem friends would like him to step down and let Hillary run. They won't vote for most republicans, of course, but they too can't imagine another 4 yrs like this.

I would take Hillary over Obama. Won't change anything in DC, a GOP president wouldn't change anything in DC, they are all working for the same cronies.

If nothing would change, why on earth would you have a preference? You aren't making any sense again.

It would be nice to have a fresh new president to snipe about. Obama is too easy a target. Dumb too!

Dr Philban wrote: The laws of averages dictate that if you keep flapping your mouth long enough, you may actually say something meaningful.

So far, it hasn't worked for you.

Conservation Voice wrote:

Dr Philban wrote: The laws of averages dictate that if you keep flapping your mouth long enough, you may actually say something meaningful.

So far, it hasn't worked for you.

I've got my fans.