People who watch Fox know less than people who watch nothing

Conservation Voice wrote: "There may be a direct relationship between the rise in ratings at Fox News and the rise of the Fox women skirts. If true, it’s an interesting programming strategy."

[youtube:bqj5hnjf]

[/youtube:bqj5hnjf]

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/fox-news-a ... ideo-photo

Ok, this video has made its rounds all over the internet, with lots of political hackster comments, so here are the Facts!
The video footage is not edited. The still photos are ALL photoshopped to shorten the dresses and skirts. The one of Laurie Dhue is a 'Net classic photoshop that's been around for a long time.

From your youtube link. I know nobody from the right will bother to check...

Speaking of hot newscasters- nobody- I mean nobody has hotter newscasters than the Russian propaganda outlet called "Russia today" or RT.

These girls work for RT out of Moscow- and are not subject to the same PC rules that American companies work under.

They are so hot that they make the Fox girls look like used up skanks- they have the best bodies- the perkiest breasts- and the freshest young faces of any news network. In fact I think a push-up bra is mandatory attire, and if you reach 35 years old you get booted out the door!

Many of them are Russian- some of them raised here in the US- but others do have a slight Russian accent. I try not to miss a broadcast- they make watching socialist propaganda a pure delight!

For all the guys out there- our local channel 12-3 has the RT broadcast every afternoon.
[imgleft:1ugqkeby] rt.com/files/about/on-air-talent/lauren-lyster/220.jpg [/imgleft:1ugqkeby]

[imgleft:1ugqkeby] rt.com/files/about/on-air-talent/anya-fe...edorova-2011-big.jpg [/imgleft:1ugqkeby]

[imgleft:1ugqkeby] rt.com/files/about/on-air-talent/kristine-frazao/frazao.jpg [/imgleft:1ugqkeby]

Fox models its newsbabes after this woman: Melissa Theuriau

She is considered by many to be the sexiest female news reader alive.

[youtube:1bz42306][/youtube:1bz42306]

Yea the french girl is sexy- but Lauren Lister gives her a run......
[youtube:33kgq30v][/youtube:33kgq30v]

Did anybody actually look at the study? A very small sample, (612) from a very limited area, (New Jersey) by an east coast liberal arts college, poli sci professor. Would you expect any different results? I'd bet good money that half of the respondents thought Fox News was a show on the cartoon network. But it makes for good press by the left.

Grady wrote: Did anybody actually look at the study?

What Study?

A small sample is ALWAYS taken, even in national polls. I'm not sure I get your point.

Did you read the questions and how they were asked (rotating some answers so as not to skew the results?)

The margin of error was + or - 3.5%, which is pretty average. Once you get to that MOE, there's little to be gained by sampling a larger percentage.

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2008/10/1 ... -of-error/

Your comment about half the respondents thinking Fox News was a cartoon network was laughable. The question asked was "As I read from a list, just say 'yes' if you got news from that source at any time in the past week." (and the list was rotated each time).

Seems like a pretty scientific poll to me.* You just don't like the results.

*The most recent survey by Fairleigh Dickinson University’s PublicMind was sponsored by WFDU Radio and
conducted by telephone from Oct. 17, 2011, through Oct. 23, 2011, using a randomly selected sample of 612
resident adults statewide. The margin of error for a sample of 612 randomly selected respondents is +/- 3.5
percentage points. The margin of error for subgroups is larger and varies by the size of that subgroup. Survey
results are also subject to non-sampling error. This kind of error, which cannot be measured, arises from a
number of factors including, but not limited to, non-response (eligible individuals refusing to be interviewed),
question wording, the order in which questions are asked, and variations among interviewers. PublicMind
interviews are conducted by Opinion America of Cedar Knolls, NJ, with professionally trained interviewers using
a CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) system. Random selection is achieved by computerized
random-digit dialing. This technique gives every person with a land-line phone number (including those with
unlisted numbers) an equal chance of being selected. Landline households are supplemented with a separate,
randomly selected sample of cell-phone-only-households, interviewed in the same time frame. The total
combined sample is mathematically weighted to match known demographics of age, race and gender.