Gingrich had a good statement on his support of one part of the DREAM act:
He said that he would support allowing some immigrants to stay and join the military, the one portion of the DREAM Act he said he liked.
"I did vote for the Simpson-Mazzoli Act … He signed it because we were gonna get two things in return: we were gonna secure the border and we were gonna get a guest-worker program with employer enforcement. We got neither," said Gingrich.
"The party that says it’s the party of the family is going to adopt a policy that destroys families that have been here a quarter century … finding a way to create legality so they are not separated from their families.”
Conservation Voice wrote: Gingrich had a good statement on his support of one part of the DREAM act:
He said that he would support allowing some immigrants to stay and join the military, the one portion of the DREAM Act he said he liked.
"I did vote for the Simpson-Mazzoli Act … He signed it because we were gonna get two things in return: we were gonna secure the border and we were gonna get a guest-worker program with employer enforcement. We got neither," said Gingrich.
"The party that says it’s the party of the family is going to adopt a policy that destroys families that have been here a quarter century … finding a way to create legality so they are not separated from their families.”
I actually agree with him here. It is funny how Newt's views on illegals and amnesty are a lot further left than Perry's but yet those who say they won't vote for Perry becaue of it, still support Newt. That is Hypocricy at it's best.
Bachmann may have leaked classified information during GOP debate
CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer asked the candidate if she agreed with Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s pledge that he would send no foreign aid to Pakistan.
“We have to recognize that 15 of the sites, nuclear sites, are available or are potentially penetrable by jihadist,” Bachmann explained. “Six attempts have already been made on nuclear sites. This is more than an existential threat.”
“At this point, I would continue that aid,” she added. “Pakistan is a nation that it’s kind of like, too nuclear to fail.”
A National Journal fact check found that the U.S. had never publicly admitted that 15 of Pakistan’s sites were vulnerable to attack, or that six of them had already been attacked.
