Fox 5 report to accuse Herman Cain of 13-year affair tonight

28 Nov 2011 17:40 #11 by Arlen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 17:48 #12 by Martin Ent Inc
He was romanced by a few to run for office and it went to his head.
If you don't think the current admin would not try to discredit the repubs then you don't understand the underhandedness of politics.
it happened when barry ran and will continue until we cleanse WA of All in office.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 17:57 #13 by Arlen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:08 #14 by chickaree
If adultery doesn't disqualify Newt why should it disqualify Cain? One starts to feel like Diogenes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:09 #15 by The Viking
OK, so they had a private phone with 61 calls and text both to and from Cain at all hours, all the way up till mid September of this year. 2 months ago. The news texted him on it to call and he did immediately. It was the news not her and they asked him about her and he admitted that he has been helping her out financially. Buying it?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:09 #16 by The Viking

chickaree wrote: If adultery doesn't disqualify Newt why should it disqualify Cain? One starts to feel like Diogenes.


But according to the phone records and her, this was still going on in September.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:13 #17 by archer

The Viking wrote:

chickaree wrote: If adultery doesn't disqualify Newt why should it disqualify Cain? One starts to feel like Diogenes.


But according to the phone records and her, this was still going on in September.

So how do we decide how many years in the past adultery has to be to make it OK?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:15 #18 by Arlen

chickaree wrote: If adultery doesn't disqualify Newt why should it disqualify Cain? One starts to feel like Diogenes.

Who says that it disqualities Cain? But it does make him toast. That is reality.

Who says that it would disquality Newt? He is still in the running. That is reality.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:17 #19 by chickaree
I will not vote for an adulterer. That is simply inexcusable to me. Can we start promoting some decent candidates now? Please?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Nov 2011 18:22 #20 by archer
How would Republicans who claim they revere family values justify supporting/voting for either Cain or Newt?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+