The ridiculous nature of the response is an apt demonstration of the ridiculousness of the premise offered. Neither would be taken seriously, nor should they be.
PrintSmith wrote: C'mon Omni - you know that no respectable OWS member would be caught dead at the actual encampment for their movement. No one other than vagrants actually hang out there after all. Why I'm betting that 99% of those at the encampment have absolutely no affiliation with the movement itself.
is an apt demonstration of the ridiculousness of the premise offered. Do only a select few here on 285Bound have permission to engage in "satire" and/or "sarcasm"?
I was referring to the ridiculous nature of my response to the ridiculousness of the quoted premise which appeared above it. My apologies for not making that more clear. I was not calling your "snark, snark, winky, winky" comment ridiculous, it was your earlier ridiculous offering that I was making a ridiculous response to. Again, my apologies for not making that sufficiently clear in my last response.
PrintSmith wrote: I was referring to the ridiculous nature of my response to the ridiculousness of the quoted premise which appeared above it. My apologies for not making that more clear. I was not calling your "snark, snark, winky, winky" comment ridiculous, it was your earlier ridiculous offering that I was making a ridiculous response to. Again, my apologies for not making that sufficiently clear in my last response.
