- Posts: 7163
- Thank you received: 21
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
JSG wrote: Beats me. Do your own research.
Because there hasn't been any new study done. Pulling something out of your ass doesn't make it true. You're lying. But thanks for playing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JSG wrote:
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
JSG wrote: Beats me. Do your own research.
Because there hasn't been any new study done. Pulling something out of your ass doesn't make it true. You're lying. But thanks for playing.
I never said there was a new study, imbecile.
JSG wrote: "My understanding is he wanted more study on the pipeline but the Republicans wanted an immediate yes or no answer so he said, "No" to approving it without the study. It's now months later."
New pipeline study would take minimum 12-18 months (Wed Jan 18, 2012)
(Reuters) - The Obama administration could save time in evaluating any new Canada-to-Texas crude oil pipeline if it hewed closely to the Keystone XL proposal, but any assessment would take at least 12-18 months, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday.
The Obama administration on Wednesday rejected the Keystone XL Canada-to-Texas crude oil pipeline project, a decision welcomed by environmental groups but blasted by the domestic energy industry and congressional Republicans.
U.S. President Barack Obama said TransCanada's application for the 1,700-mile (2,740-km) pipeline was denied because the State Department did not have enough time to complete the review process.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/ ... 3M20120118
“Unresolved concerns” over the original 1,700-mile pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf Coast refineries – including energy security, economic effects, and environmental impacts – caused Mr. Obama in January to reject the overall pipeline application.
"Today I'm directing my administration to cut through the red tape, break through the bureaucratic hurdles, and make this project a priority, to go ahead and get it done."
Environmentalists cheered the president then, while noting Obama's caveat that the decision could change after environmental reviews are completed. But few expected the White House to be banging the drum for Keystone XL so soon.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2 ... line-video
Sullivan explains the president only has the authority to block lines that run internationally. Therefore, because it doesn’t cross international borders, the so-called Cushing pipeline doesn’t require the president’s approval. In fact, as Sullivan notes, President Obama personally lobbied Congress to vote against the pipeline.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-w ... producing/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
Study up on it imbecile.JSG wrote: I never said there was a new study, imbecile.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
JSG wrote:
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
Study up on it imbecile.JSG wrote: I never said there was a new study, imbecile.
At least have the intellectual fortitude to come up with your own rhetoric. Don't steal mine and pass it off as your own.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.