Romney's got his own birthers.

Arlen wrote: Number of delegates does equal majority of Republicans.
Number of delegates does not equal majority of votes.

Nice try, though.

I didn't say that majority of delegates = majority of Republicans.

Nice try, though.

Arlen wrote: Since when is 30% a majority?

When the 30% is by far the highest percentage for any candidate, idiot.

They're all running against each other, not all the rest against Romney.

If the Republicans were voting for a candidate, he'd win. Santorum would come in second, Gingrich would come in a distant third.

Why is that so friggin hard for you to comprehend?

Kate wrote:

Arlen wrote: Number of delegates does equal majority of Republicans.
Number of delegates does not equal majority of votes.

Nice try, though.

I didn't say that majority of delegates = majority of Republicans.

Nice try, though.

Hey, Kate, whenever you come to the defense of another poster, then you are defending his statements.

JSG wrote:

Arlen wrote: Since when is 30% a majority?

When the 30% is by far the highest percentage for any candidate, idiot.

They're all running against each other, not all the rest against Romney.

If the Republicans were voting for a candidate, he'd win. Santorum would come in second, Gingrich would come in a distant third.

Why is that so friggin hard for you to comprehend?

The term is not majority. It is plurality. Is that so friggin hard for you to comprehend? Please educate yourself.

(And, please, stop the childish name calling.)

Arlen wrote:

Kate wrote:

Arlen wrote: Number of delegates does equal majority of Republicans.
Number of delegates does not equal majority of votes.

Nice try, though.

I didn't say that majority of delegates = majority of Republicans.

Nice try, though.

Hey, Kate, whenever you come to the defense of another poster, then you are defending his statements.

I didn't come to the defense of anyone. I merely pointed out the current delegate count.

Nice try, though.

And I will admit I confused plurality to majority. My bad.

Can we move on?

JSG wrote: Can we move on?

No, dammit!! We have to ridicule, deride, browbeat, slap, and nitpick the "opposition" into oblivion rather than have adult discourse. Suck it up, JSG -- you're in the courthouse for crap's sake!