Rush advertiser lost mostly hype from the left

residenttroll wrote: If liberal ideas were strongly held by a large audience and there would be more liberal radio stations in the country - with advertisers. Liberals are intellectual free speech bullies who want others to believe that their message is strongly held. Sadly, just like their ideas, they are a minority with big mouths.

Well that certainly explains the last presidential election.

residenttroll wrote: Liberals will do anything to limit free speech. Conservatives don't boycott Keith Olbermann sponsors but.....he doesn't have any...and most likely the reason he doesn't have a show... he didn't have advertisers because he didn't have an audience.

If liberal ideas were strongly held by a large audience and there would be more liberal radio stations in the country - with advertisers. Liberals are intellectual free speech bullies who want others to believe that their message is strongly held. Sadly, just like their ideas, they are a minority with big mouths.

Actually I think elements from both sides like to silence their opponents. I especially despise hecklers who try to shout down speakers people pay to see. You can voice dissent but let the person speak.

I don't want to silence anyone, including Rush, but I will take any opportunity to show them for the fools they are. Of course Rush does a pretty good job of that all by himself.

archer wrote: I don't want to silence anyone, including Rush, but I will take any opportunity to show them for the fools they are. Of course Rush does a pretty good job of that all by himself.

Exactly so many times let the people hang themselves with their own words. And Rush deserved to take a penalty for his verbal attacks on Fluke. I think he did. Will it make him think before he speaks next time? Doubtful.

FredHayek wrote:

archer wrote: I don't want to silence anyone, including Rush, but I will take any opportunity to show them for the fools they are. Of course Rush does a pretty good job of that all by himself.

Exactly so many times let the people hang themselves with their own words. And Rush deserved to take a penalty for his verbal attacks on Fluke. I think he did. Will it make him think before he speaks next time? Doubtful.

Rush was right about Fluke....anyone who wants the government or other individuals to pay for their sexual activities is a sl^t and whore. It must be tough borrowing taxpayer backed student loan money to pay for $ 45K per year at GW law school and not be able to afford birth control. Maybe we should allow students to borrow $ 1000 per year for birth control. Better yet, it's tougher having to abstain for something you can't afford.

http://www.law.gwu.edu/Admissions/tuiti ... fault.aspx

<duplicate>

I don't know. I would much rather buy a few years of birth control than 18 years of welfare.

Perhaps it is all PSA filler, since I do not listen to commercials I can't say. I can say that Rush goes to break about 3 minutes before Thom Hartman at the top of the hour.

FredHayek wrote: I don't know. I would much rather buy a few years of birth control than 18 years of welfare.

She's already on welfare..... $200K in government backed student loans.