However I will generally answer a direct question, unless it is from an ignorant troll. Just not always in a direct way.
OK here is a question, what is your point? I am not an ignorant troll. You seem to post a lot of links with no opinion. Get some balls, do you agree or disagree with the articles you post?
Depends on the post of course. In this thread I thought my opening Parrgraph made it obvious this was just a tweek. That is tweek, not tweet.
Thanks for caring.
Btw, as I have said before:
neptunechimney wrote:
Photo-fish wrote: Who needs to voice their own opinions when you can use somebody elses? Just cut, paste and run....
Talking points are just that if you can't or won't back them up with your OWN opinion.
I wish people would at least give SOME personal input on a topic when they post links to other websites. Heck, if I wanted to read or watch the news I would do just that.
.
IMO, this is a clear example of Flouncing.
Edit: Hat tip to Local Historian, who introduced me to the term.
Sunshine Girl wrote: Am I in the minority because I've never tweeted?
It might be a sign of my age but I see absolutely no point in Twitter, to me it's just more evidence of how self absorbed younger people are. I can see the value in calling a friend or family member and sharing a candid bit of information because I assume my friends and relations actually care about what is going on in my life. Letting anyone and everyone with Internet connectivity know that I'm about to buy a slice of pizza, change the oil in a vehicle, or make dinner seems to me that any one cares or wants to know.
Can we all get together and get PrintSmith a twitter account? Can you just imagine him trying to put his opinions into a few lines? Sure could keep him occupied for awhile!
archer wrote: Can we all get together and get PrintSmith a twitter account? Can you just imagine him trying to put his opinions into a few lines? Sure could keep him occupied for awhile!
That's probably a more worthwhile activity than those who have nothing to say.
archer wrote: Can we all get together and get PrintSmith a twitter account? Can you just imagine him trying to put his opinions into a few lines? Sure could keep him occupied for awhile!
Yes archer, your debate style is far superior to that of PrintSmith. We all hail your lack of mockery as well.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
archer wrote: Can we all get together and get PrintSmith a twitter account? Can you just imagine him trying to put his opinions into a few lines? Sure could keep him occupied for awhile!
Yes archer, your debate style is far superior to that of PrintSmith. We all hail your lack of mockery as well.
Lighten up bill....PrintSmith and I have been going round and round on his "wordiness" for years.....this board is getting way to sensitive and serious.
Sunshine Girl wrote: Am I in the minority because I've never tweeted?
It might be a sign of my age but I see absolutely no point in Twitter, to me it's just more evidence of how self absorbed younger people are. I can see the value in calling a friend or family member and sharing a candid bit of information because I assume my friends and relations actually care about what is going on in my life. Letting anyone and everyone with Internet connectivity know that I'm about to buy a slice of pizza, change the oil in a vehicle, or make dinner seems to me that any one cares or wants to know.
" I'll try anything once, twice if I like it, three times to make sure. " Mae West
