HURT: Brutal week for Obama, the worst of his presidency

archer wrote: I will take Obama at his worst over any of the candidates from the Republican field. No matter how bad things are the conservatives always show us how they could make it worse.

And you have him at his worst. Party time. You're easily pleased. Leftist... reaching for the mediocre for 50 years.

4 more years of Him???

We are Fu $ k d.

Soulshiner wrote: Worst weeks? I think Lincoln, JFK, Nixon and Clinton would disagree.

But just this week Biden remarked that Obama has had more problems which are cases of first-instance laid on his table than any president in the 20th or 21st centuries, including FDR.........

“I think I can say … no president, and I would argue in the 20th century and including now the 21st century, has had as many serious problems which are cases of first-instance laid on his table,” Biden said. “Franklin Roosevelt faced more dire consequences, but in a bizarre way it was more straightforward.”

abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/ob...ecisions-biden-says/
You are actually harping on a conservative blogger intimating the same things as the VP himself is?

Soulshiner wrote: "The past seven brutal days will go down as one of the worst weeks in history for a sitting president."

somehow I believe that the week of September 11, 2001 was worse. As well as the week of October 23, 1983 with the death of 241 American servicemen.

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

archer wrote: I will take Obama at his worst over any of the candidates from the Republican field. No matter how bad things are the conservatives always show us how they could make it worse.

And you have him at his worst. Party time. You're easily pleased. Leftist... reaching for the mediocre for 50 years.

Actually I am not easily pleased...but I deal with reality....Obama is the candidate for the Democrats, that is unlikely to change. Romney or the longshot Santorum will be the Republican candidate. Obama is light years better for this country than either Republican choice....it is what it is. The Republicans are stuck with a couple of very poor choices.

archer wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

archer wrote: I will take Obama at his worst over any of the candidates from the Republican field. No matter how bad things are the conservatives always show us how they could make it worse.

And you have him at his worst. Party time. You're easily pleased. Leftist... reaching for the mediocre for 50 years.

Actually I am not easily pleased...but I deal with reality....Obama is the candidate for the Democrats, that is unlikely to change. Romney or the longshot Santorum will be the Republican candidate. Obama is light years better for this country than either Republican choice....it is what it is. The Republicans are stuck with a couple of very poor choices.

In your biased opinion. The only experience Obama has is his time in office...and he won't be running on what he's done as much as trying to tear down his opponent. I doubt you know much about how Romney would govern...you voted for a guy with ZERO experience already.

CritiKalbILL wrote:

archer wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

archer wrote: I will take Obama at his worst over any of the candidates from the Republican field. No matter how bad things are the conservatives always show us how they could make it worse.

And you have him at his worst. Party time. You're easily pleased. Leftist... reaching for the mediocre for 50 years.

Actually I am not easily pleased...but I deal with reality....Obama is the candidate for the Democrats, that is unlikely to change. Romney or the longshot Santorum will be the Republican candidate. Obama is light years better for this country than either Republican choice....it is what it is. The Republicans are stuck with a couple of very poor choices.

In your biased opinion. The only experience Obama has is his time in office...and he won't be running on what he's done as much as trying to tear down his opponent. I doubt you know much about how Romney would govern...you voted for a guy with ZERO experience already.

Actually we know how the Etch a Sketch candidate would govern, based on the thousands of jobs sent to China under his business, companies put into bankruptcy, loss of jobs while governor of Massachusetts, individual mandate for health insurance, etc.

Interesting that the same people who blast Obama for the individual mandate and the healthcare bill are quite happy to support a candidate who also did both. But they claim they are not hypocrites.

The worst of week for Obama is coming in November.

archer wrote: Interesting that the same people who blast Obama for the individual mandate and the healthcare bill are quite happy to support a candidate who also did both. But they claim they are not hypocrites.

Difference between a sovereign State government and a federal one - which conservatives recognize and "progressives" can't seem to wrap their collectivist collective minds around. The citizens of Massachusetts, by and large, are collectivists themselves and are entitled to the government which they believe will be best for their security and happiness. I have no interest, no concern, with how the citizens of Massachusetts decide to govern themselves, their government is foreign to my own as a citizen of the State of Colorado. Romney, unlike Obama, recognizes this constitutional distinction, which is why he will issue waivers for all of the sovereign States from that overreaching attempt to usurp even more power by the federal government if it miraculously survives the challenge to its constitutionality being considered in the Supreme Court.