Wily Fox aka Angela wrote: I would say in Romney's case, no matter your political affiliation, you'd have to know that the guy is an empty suit - he isn't committed to anything except to say what he thinks people in the room at the time want to hear. He really defines flip flop in the literal sense. I believe that people (and especially politicians) should evolve their views on things as they learn more and age and experience, etc. and think previous allegations of flip-floppiness in many other politician's cases were unfounded. In Romney's case, however, he is the quintessential political whore - saying whatever he needs to say for money.
I see the same thing you see but am not as worried about it aas you. It is called listening to the people. But I believe Mitt isn't in it for the money. I think he mainly wants the prestige of being president.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
