Your sources are a little one sided. I am watching Mitt on Hannity right now and he supports giving green cards to illegals who serve in the US military.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Perhaps you should get your rebuttals from something other than your usual sources: Redstate, Breitbart, ad nauseum... I'm not terribly interested in what Romney has to say 60 hours later, after his handlers and speechwriters have finally come up with something for him to regurgitate on Hannity.
Shut this thread down. OMIGOD, a man who actually takes the time to think out an issue. A thinker in the White House, what a nice change from Obama.
A befuddled man who only made a decision about the Dream Act three years too late? A man so out of his depth, the VP Biden guilted him into supporting homosexual marraige.
And unlike you, i partake from many sources for my news besides slanted hit pieces from HuffPo. Like NPR, the Week, the Economist, Yahoo, AP, etc.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Romney wouldn't have an independent thought if his life depended on it. He can't say anything about social issues unless it's been approved by Franklin Graham or Tony Perkins; he can't say anything about taxes that hasn't been approved by Grover Norquist; he can't say anything about legislation that hasn't been approved by Mitch McConnell...
"a man who actually takes the time to think out an issue."... rofllol rofllol No, I don't think so.
Yes, I know Obama never takes a side without having his political handlers considering the polls.
Illinois statehouse: I support Gay marriage
Illinois Senator: I support Gay marriage.
Presidential Canidadate: Marriage should be between a man and a woman.
Presidential Candidate who needs more donations from Homosexual friendly sources like Hollywood: I support repealing DOMA.
Yes, clearly a free thinker, or a flip-flopper.
Just like Romney who claimed to be gay friendly when he was running against Teddy Kennedy.
These are politicians, not statesman.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
For every Obama flip-flop, Romney has at least 10......whoopie!!!! Romney is winning!!!!!!
I am amused by Romney though.....so far he has run himself way right to get the nomination, now we can see him slowly inching his way back to more moderate positions....hoping all the while that the far right either won't notice, or more likely, realize they have little choice but to support him, even if he is the antithesis of what they wanted. Romney's biggest problem come November may be apathy on the right....no they won't vote for Obama, but will they show up at the polls at all?
archer wrote: For every Obama flip-flop, Romney has at least 10......whoopie!!!! Romney is winning!!!!!!
I am amused by Romney though.....so far he has run himself way right to get the nomination, now we can see him slowly inching his way back to more moderate positions....hoping all the while that the far right either won't notice, or more likely, realize they have little choice but to support him, even if he is the antithesis of what they wanted. Romney's biggest problem come November may be apathy on the right....no they won't vote for Obama, but will they show up at the polls at all?
That is politics. But Obama may have the same issue with turnout. Voters for Barack aren't making history this time. And now they are voting for a man and not a dream.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
rofllol 
