Holder in Contempt!

Yes all a bunch of BS. Business as usual in DC.

Something the Dog Said wrote: Which has absolutely no meaning whatsoever. It is merely a resolution, which Speaker Boner submits to, guess who, Attorney General Holder to prosecute within his discretion, if he so chooses. Holder will be the attorney general for the next four 1/2 years, if he so chooses.

Really? Well this does...

The House just followed up on their criminal contempt vote with an affirmative civil contempt vote, which will allow them to hire their own counsel to challenge President Obama’s invocation of executive privilege. Which, as Rep. Trey Gowdy explained in a video this morning, they’re ready and rarin’ to do.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/28/b ... -contempt/

You're swimming in the wrong direction.

If Holder is "in contempt of Congress", he'll join about 87% of the American people....

yes the 87%ers

Democracy4Sale wrote: If Holder is "in contempt of Congress", he'll join about 87% of the American people....

That's right... take down the majority of the citizens of this country, left or right, just to make your point. That's the way of the left. Anyone is fodder for getting a seat under the bus if it serves the left's ideology. Sad.

Entitlement Whore wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Which has absolutely no meaning whatsoever. It is merely a resolution, which Speaker Boner submits to, guess who, Attorney General Holder to prosecute within his discretion, if he so chooses. Holder will be the attorney general for the next four 1/2 years, if he so chooses.

Really? Well this does...

The House just followed up on their criminal contempt vote with an affirmative civil contempt vote, which will allow them to hire their own counsel to challenge President Obama’s invocation of executive privilege. Which, as Rep. Trey Gowdy explained in a video this morning, they’re ready and rarin’ to do.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/28/b ... -contempt/

You're swimming in the wrong direction.

That reading comprehension problem of yours still needs a lot of work. The criminal contempt charge which the Martin was celebrating has no effect as I stated against Holder. the civil contempt charges only goes to the claim of executive privilege, which means that the House GOP will spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in an attempt to go to trial in 2 or three years to determine whether or not they were entitled to the documents, for an issue that Issa has already stated is a non-issue. So to celebrate either contempt charge is a non-issue, other than a waste of taxpayer funds, and will have zero effect on the issues before this great country.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Entitlement Whore wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Which has absolutely no meaning whatsoever. It is merely a resolution, which Speaker Boner submits to, guess who, Attorney General Holder to prosecute within his discretion, if he so chooses. Holder will be the attorney general for the next four 1/2 years, if he so chooses.

Really? Well this does...

The House just followed up on their criminal contempt vote with an affirmative civil contempt vote, which will allow them to hire their own counsel to challenge President Obama’s invocation of executive privilege. Which, as Rep. Trey Gowdy explained in a video this morning, they’re ready and rarin’ to do.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/28/b ... -contempt/

You're swimming in the wrong direction.

That reading comprehension problem of yours still needs a lot of work. The criminal contempt charge which the Martin was celebrating has no effect as I stated against Holder. the civil contempt charges only goes to the claim of executive privilege, which means that the House GOP will spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in an attempt to go to trial in 2 or three years to determine whether or not they were entitled to the documents, for an issue that Issa has already stated is a non-issue. So to celebrate either contempt charge is a non-issue, other than a waste of taxpayer funds, and will have zero effect on the issues before this great country.

Well... it's a non-issue with you and some on the left. I guess that makes it moot. rofllol