Even in the long run, if they have any effect all, it would be extremely marginal
The Republican package is unlikely to do much for real job creation
Isn't it fascinating that you're already willing to give Romney 3-4 years (or longer) for his "plan" (which the economists are already saying is a joke) to work, but Obama has already created 4.2 million jobs in the private sector in 3-1/2 years, (which is more than the 3 million jobs Bush created in 8 years).
It's a lot easier to create 4.2 million jobs when the unemployment rate is 10% that it is to create 3 million jobs when the unemployment rate is 5%. Just sayin'.
Anyone know how many of "Obama's" 4.2 million jobs are in the Bakken oil fields? I use quotes because I don't give Obama credit for those jobs.
FredHayek wrote: Consumers are job creators? Really?
Yes...Really.
So to climb out of the Obama morass, we should have just sent every American a check for $1000, like "W" did, instead of financing solar companies with unreal expectations?
Then those consumers would have bought American products from American companies, right?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Democracy4Sale wrote: No, we should stop giving tax-breaks to the 1%/"job-creators" ( ) and waiting for it to "trickle-down"... which it hasn't, doesn't, and won't.
Pelosi and other coastal Dems don't like your idea. They want no tax increases for people earning under one million dollars a year. The 0.1% percent tax hike?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I believe it all... Just as I believe that the biggest threat to freedom and success in the United States is the Republican Party. Never doubt my sincerity for a minute.
) and waiting for it to "trickle-down"... which it hasn't, doesn't, and won't. 
