Wasserman-Schultz: 'I Have No Idea' Of Political Affiliation

You just can't answer any direct \questions can you dog? Who, if not a group affiliated with the Dems, would run that ad... Martians? You are as dishonest as Schultz.

CritiKalBill wrote: You just can't answer any direct \questions can you dog? Who, if not a group affiliated with the Dems, would run that ad... Martians? You are as dishonest as Schultz.

You don't know me hypoCritiKalBill. Please read my earlier posts. It could have been an independent group who are affiliated with those that have had their lives and livelihood ruined by Mitt's destructive ways in amassing his fortune. But then you are not really interested in that, only with deflecting attention away from the content of the video itself. I could care less with the political idealogy of those behind the video, as it has absolutely no importance. I leave such trivial pursuits to you.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

CritiKalBill wrote: You just can't answer any direct \questions can you dog? Who, if not a group affiliated with the Dems, would run that ad... Martians? You are as dishonest as Schultz.

You don't know me hypoCritiKalBill. Please read my earlier posts. It could have been an independent group who are affiliated with those that have had their lives and livelihood ruined by Mitt's destructive ways in amassing his fortune. But then you are not really interested in that, only with deflecting attention away from the content of the video itself. I could care less with the political idealogy of those behind the video, as it has absolutely no importance. I leave such trivial pursuits to you.

So this "independent group" has no affiliation with the Dems, they just want to spend millions on a false ad that will help Obama win? Does that make any sense?

Here's another checkmate for me:

Priorities USA was started last year by Bill Burton, a 2008 Obama campaign staffer and Obama White House spokesman, and Sean Sweeney, an Obama administration political aide.

Now tell me Wassaman Schultz has no idea what Priorities USA is or who these men are who started it... go ahead. (maybe Fox just made this up )
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08 ... ities-usa/

So here's an update for you Dog... looks like I have some magical powers of mind reading. How did I know Schultz was lying and you had no clue?
So on Sundayy, she said very clearly that she had no idea what party affiliation Priority USA aligned with, but today while being interviewed, she suddenly knows!

“Soledad, of course I know the Priorities USA super PAC is a Democratic-affiliated super PAC,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But the point I was trying to make was that ad was produced by a separate organization, an organization that we don’t coordinate with, that we have nothing to do with.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/08 ... z23SvkUfS4

But since you believed her first lie, I also expect you to believe her second lie that she has nothing to do with or coordinate with this group (started by Obama people)

CritiKalBill wrote: So here's an update for you Dog... looks like I have some magical powers of mind reading. How did I know Schultz was lying and you had no clue?
So on Sundayy, she said very clearly that she had no idea what party affiliation Priority USA aligned with, but today while being interviewed, she suddenly knows!

“Soledad, of course I know the Priorities USA super PAC is a Democratic-affiliated super PAC,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But the point I was trying to make was that ad was produced by a separate organization, an organization that we don’t coordinate with, that we have nothing to do with.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/08 ... z23SvkUfS4

But since you believed her first lie, I also expect you to believe her second lie that she has nothing to do with or coordinate with this group (started by Obama people)

I stand by my posts, I have no knowledge of what Ms. Wasserman-Schultz knew, I have no knowledge of what the idealogy of the group behind the ad is, and it is possible that the ad was from those who are disgusted with the pursuit of wealth by Romney at the cost of lives and livilihoods of American citizens.

Why is the idealogy of this group so critical to you? Too much time on your hands?

Something the Dog Said wrote:

CritiKalBill wrote: So here's an update for you Dog... looks like I have some magical powers of mind reading. How did I know Schultz was lying and you had no clue?
So on Sundayy, she said very clearly that she had no idea what party affiliation Priority USA aligned with, but today while being interviewed, she suddenly knows!

“Soledad, of course I know the Priorities USA super PAC is a Democratic-affiliated super PAC,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But the point I was trying to make was that ad was produced by a separate organization, an organization that we don’t coordinate with, that we have nothing to do with.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/08 ... z23SvkUfS4

But since you believed her first lie, I also expect you to believe her second lie that she has nothing to do with or coordinate with this group (started by Obama people)

I stand by my posts, I have no knowledge of what Ms. Wasserman-Schultz knew, I have no knowledge of what the idealogy of the group behind the ad is, and it is possible that the ad was from those who are disgusted with the pursuit of wealth by Romney at the cost of lives and livilihoods of American citizens.

Why is the idealogy of this group so critical to you? Too much time on your hands?

Well you know now... confirmed by the Chairwomen of the DNC.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

CritiKalBill wrote: So here's an update for you Dog... looks like I have some magical powers of mind reading. How did I know Schultz was lying and you had no clue?
So on Sundayy, she said very clearly that she had no idea what party affiliation Priority USA aligned with, but today while being interviewed, she suddenly knows!

“Soledad, of course I know the Priorities USA super PAC is a Democratic-affiliated super PAC,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But the point I was trying to make was that ad was produced by a separate organization, an organization that we don’t coordinate with, that we have nothing to do with.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/08 ... z23SvkUfS4

But since you believed her first lie, I also expect you to believe her second lie that she has nothing to do with or coordinate with this group (started by Obama people)

I stand by my posts, I have no knowledge of what Ms. Wasserman-Schultz knew, I have no knowledge of what the idealogy of the group behind the ad is, and it is possible that the ad was from those who are disgusted with the pursuit of wealth by Romney at the cost of lives and livilihoods of American citizens.

Why is the idealogy of this group so critical to you? Too much time on your hands?

The topic of the thread is whether or not Wassaman Schultz was lying. Since the lie has been confirmed, we can now move on. :thumbsup: