Romney calls 63% of Americans "small minded"

Grady wrote:

Raees wrote: Something's there. If everything was on the up and up he wouldn't be so adamant about not releasing his returns.

Something's there (Obama). If everything was on the up and up he wouldn't be so adamant about not releasing his college admission, passport, Draft, travel and passport records.

Maybe he doesn't like being singled out because he's black.

Any white guys release that stuff before he was asked? (Joe Biden released his college records). He's the only one I'm aware of.

PrintSmith wrote:

Raees wrote: Something's there. If everything was on the up and up he wouldn't be so adamant about not releasing his returns.

If everything wasn't on the up and up the IRS would be asking a lot more questions of Romney than you are Raees.

How do you know they are not? IRS investigations are not public knowledge. For example, since he has participated in Swiss bank tax shelters before, it may be that he plead guilty for tax fraud under the UBS amnesty program in 2009. That would certainly be relevant to his fitness to be POTUS, while not public knowledge.

Grady wrote:

Raees wrote: Something's there. If everything was on the up and up he wouldn't be so adamant about not releasing his returns.

Something's there (Obama). If everything was on the up and up he wouldn't be so adamant about not releasing his college admission, passport, Draft, travel and passport records.

What other president has been requested for such personal records? Hmm, wonder why he has been singled out? I have yet to see you make these demands of Romney.

Martin Ent Inc wrote: 63% must be liberals, that don't want to succeed further than what they can get from the government, or a meager salary.

If 63% are liberals, you're already admitting that you are going to lose the election.

I'm not running.

About the kind of stupid answer I expected from a stupid poster.

Something the Dog Said wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Has the law been a maximum of $30K a year since it was adopted Dog? How about before the feds got around to limiting the annual contributions made to such financial instruments? Is the $30K figure what one is allowed to contribute tax free, or with pre-tax money or the maximum amount allowed to be contributed period? I ask all of these questions because of your propensity to provide only part of the information on a fairly consistent basis and I am not familiar with these financial instruments at all, nor would I have the beginnings of a clue as to where to begin researching the answers for myself.

Sure you do. Go to google or the search engine of your choice. Type in key words such as IRA limitations. Select sources that you find credible, such as IRS.gov All of your questions should be answered in this manner, rather than try to subordinate others into doing your work for you. I prefer to teach you to fish rather than simply give you a fish.

Perhaps he invested shares into the IRA Dog? If the shares had a value at or under the max that one can contribute when they were invested and then paid very handsome returns, wouldn't that be one means by which the IRA's value could have blossomed to its present value?

Raees wrote: Maybe he doesn't like being singled out because he's black.

And maybe the reason that he's been singled out has nothing to do with the color of his skin and everything to do with having a parent and a step parent who were aliens.

Democracy4Sale wrote: About the kind of stupid answer I expected from a stupid poster.

And you are an ass scratching, arm pit smelling, nose picking, wal-mart strutting,
low life, white trash pc O shit.

You always revert to calling people names and showing us just how low a bottom feeder of your type is. When you ain't got nothing nice to say you bring out the name card.
I feel sorry for you i really do.
WAPOS

PrintSmith wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

PrintSmith wrote: Has the law been a maximum of $30K a year since it was adopted Dog? How about before the feds got around to limiting the annual contributions made to such financial instruments? Is the $30K figure what one is allowed to contribute tax free, or with pre-tax money or the maximum amount allowed to be contributed period? I ask all of these questions because of your propensity to provide only part of the information on a fairly consistent basis and I am not familiar with these financial instruments at all, nor would I have the beginnings of a clue as to where to begin researching the answers for myself.

Sure you do. Go to google or the search engine of your choice. Type in key words such as IRA limitations. Select sources that you find credible, such as IRS.gov All of your questions should be answered in this manner, rather than try to subordinate others into doing your work for you. I prefer to teach you to fish rather than simply give you a fish.

Perhaps he invested shares into the IRA Dog? If the shares had a value at or under the max that one can contribute when they were invested and then paid very handsome returns, wouldn't that be one means by which the IRA's value could have blossomed to its present value?

We will not know until he releases his returns.