Mitt’s shameful Libya statement

12 Sep 2012 18:31 #31 by Mary Scott

Democracy4Sale wrote: Then you obviously would rather remain stupid... My bad... So, here... Use my source:

That would be your next source.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 18:35 #32 by LadyJazzer
:lol:

God, you really ARE as stupid as I thought you were...

I can't make this stuff up... :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 18:40 #33 by Mary Scott

Democracy4Sale wrote: :lol:

God, you really ARE as stupid as I thought you were...

I can't make this stuff up... :lol:

Sure you can.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 20:30 #34 by lionshead2010
The only shameful action I can see here is the relative inaction and apologetic stance of our President.

He and his administration are a true embarrassment to our country. How anyone who calls them self an American can see it any other way is beyond me.

I am embarrassed for both the President and Secretary Clinton.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 20:35 #35 by LadyJazzer
Since the whole schtick about "Apology" has been totally debunked, let me know when you have something new to be outraged about. The fact that RMoney keeps accusing him of saying something that he hasn't said, still doesn't make it true.

I'M embarrassed for the GOP... They're stuck with this moron and his ventriloquist-dummy VP, and after watching that sorry excuse for a convention, I'd be sorry too, if I were you.

It's still entertaining to watch the TeaPublicans continue to try to apologize for RMoney's MAJOR screwup and try to find any justification they can to explain this fabulous display of incompetence. :thumbsup:

Romney: Shoot first, aim later....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 20:48 #36 by appleannie
As usual, Jim Wright nails it :

The filmmaker has apparently gone into hiding. Why am I not surprised?

Now, here in America, that kind of assholery is permitted under the First Amendment. In America we have the right to freedom of speech, and freedom from having to be responsible for the consequences of what we say. Somebody else will do it for you, suffer the consequences that is. You make a film or burn somebody’s holy book and generally act like an asshole, and somebody else, a soldier or a diplomat or even just some random American who happens to be in the wrong place, why they’ll be happy to step up and take responsibility for your freedom of speech. And you? Well you can hide behind your rights and your internet anonymity and your God and bask in your patriotism. Good on you.

<snip>

Funny how a conservative like Romney would condemn his fellow Americans under attack in the Cairo embassy for exercising their right to speak freely in an attempt to save lives and quell rising violence, but defend an anonymous bigot’s right to free speech when he posts a film that may have gotten Americans killed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 21:00 #37 by archer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 21:44 #38 by Reverend Revelant

appleannie wrote:
[snip]

Funny how a conservative like Romney would condemn his fellow Americans under attack in the Cairo embassy for exercising their right to speak freely in an attempt to save lives and quell rising violence, but defend an anonymous bigot’s right to free speech when he posts a film that may have gotten Americans killed.

[/quote]

Funny how the White House said basically the same thing that Romney did...

But Obama’s remarks belie the enormous frustration of top officials at the State Department and White House with the actions of the man behind the statement, Cairo senior public affairs officer Larry Schwartz, who wrote the release and oversees the embassy’s Twitter feed, according to a detailed account of the Tuesday’s events…

“The statement was not cleared with anyone in Washington. It was sent as ‘This is what we are putting out,’” the official said. “We replied and said this was not a good statement and that it needed major revisions. The next email we received from Embassy Cairo was ‘We just put this out.’”…

“People at the highest levels both at the State Department and at the White House were not happy with the way the statement went down. There was a lot of anger both about the process and the content,” the official said. “Frankly, people here did not understand it. The statement was just tone deaf. It didn’t provide adequate balance. We thought the references were inappropriate, and we strongly advised against the kind of language that talked about ‘continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims.’”

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/12/a ... was-awful/


Romney was ahead of the curve.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 21:53 #39 by Raees

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

12 Sep 2012 22:08 #40 by Raees
Speaking of subservient wives....

Ohio governor at Romney rally: Our wives are at home doing laundry

Republican Gov. John Kasich of Ohio said Wednesday at a Romney campaign rally that his wife was at home doing laundry while he gave political speeches.

“You know, Jane Portman, Karen Kasich, and Janna Ryan, they operate an awful lot of the time in the shadows,” he said in Owensville, referring to the wife of Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, his own wife, and the wife of Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, respectively.

“It’s not easy to be a spouse of an elected official,” Kasich continued. “You know, they’re at home, doing the laundry and doing so many things while we’re up here on the stage getting applause, right? They don’t often share in it. And it is hard for the spouse to hear the criticism and to put up with the travel schedule and to have to be at home taking care of the kids. And where is the politician? Out on the road.”


Like other Republicans, Kasich has had to fight off claims that he is engaged in a so-called “war on women” because of his opposition to reproductive rights.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/09/12/o ... g-laundry/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.157 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+