The Muslim Brotherhood

22 Sep 2012 09:09 #11 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic The Muslim Brotherhood
Good news. Think Obama needs to make a speech to the Libyans and condemn them for clinging to guns and religion? I have liked seeing Libyans condemning the AQ attacks on the US and our ambassador.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Sep 2012 09:18 #12 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic The Muslim Brotherhood
We'll just forget about the conservatives who had called for bombing Libya and cutting off all aid.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Sep 2012 17:57 #13 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The Muslim Brotherhood

Raees wrote: We'll just forget about the conservatives who had called for bombing Libya and cutting off all aid.

Who said theyu wanted to bomb Libya? I'm assuming you have a source.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Sep 2012 18:32 #14 by Raees
Replied by Raees on topic The Muslim Brotherhood
No, I'm going with the Romney argument: we don't need facts.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Sep 2012 18:39 #15 by Blazer Bob
Replied by Blazer Bob on topic The Muslim Brotherhood

Raees wrote: No, I'm going with the Romney argument: we don't need facts.



You must be on the same wavelength as the rest of the liberal rat pack.

Actually I just wanted to quote that for prosperity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Sep 2012 18:53 #16 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic The Muslim Brotherhood
Gee, it wasn't the liberal rat pack that said it... It was the Money-Boo-Boo campaign.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Sep 2012 19:15 #17 by Blazer Bob
Replied by Blazer Bob on topic The Muslim Brotherhood

Raees wrote: No, I'm going with the Romney argument: we don't need facts.


Spin Skippy, spin. His comment was about liberal sycophants who will attempt to turn any atrocity into an Obama talking point.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Sep 2012 14:14 #18 by bailey bud
Replied by bailey bud on topic The Muslim Brotherhood
I think of the Brotherhood as the Pentecostals of Islam.
As I understand, the Brotherhood originated from a Sufi group, who was primarily concerned with holiness (as defined by Islam).

They were outlawed by Mubarak because they noticed that he wasn't very holy.
(he wasn't).

"Allah is our objective" would suggest the brotherhood is anything but secular.

I can't see the Brotherhood as being secular, just as I can't see Pat Robertson as being secular.

Yet - in a warped, bizarre sense - Robertson seemed to think it was a secular gig:

In the quest for the highest secular prize our nation has to offer a third place finish is respectable.


(from Robertson's 1989 book, The Plan )

Maybe the Brotherhood sees the position as being secular - just as Pat Robertson did.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Sep 2012 11:54 #19 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic The Muslim Brotherhood

Raees wrote: No, I'm going with the Romney argument: we don't need facts.

Why don't you just stand behind your own idiotic statements that you pull out of your ass instead of deflecting to Romney?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.156 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+