Rocky Mountain Gun Owners Attacks Jane Norton Anti-Buck Ad

22 Jul 2010 12:15 #1 by FredHayek
I got an e-mail from Dudley saying it looks to him like Jane Norton is anti-gun because she attacks Ken Buck for his misssteps in a weak gun case. Earlier this week, I was looking to vote for Norton because I thought she was more likely to win in November, but do I really want to support someone who runs such negative ads? And appears to support witchhunts against gun owners.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Jul 2010 13:43 #2 by Cadillacokeefe
Just one more reason to vote for Ken Buck. :thumbsup:

We heard him speak about a week ago & were very impressed with him. He is very candid and explained the whole situation that Norton attacks him about in her ads. I found his explanation very credible. Before hearing him speak, I was fence sitting. Afterwards, I am 100% behind him.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Jul 2010 13:47 #3 by mtntrekker
jane norton ads are going to come back and bite her in the arse. she lost my vote.

bumper sticker - honk if you will pay my mortgage

"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." attributed to Margaret Thatcher

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." Thomas Jefferson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Jul 2010 13:55 #4 by Something the Dog Said
Plus he does not wear high heels.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Jul 2010 14:13 #5 by Cadillacokeefe
rofllol At least he didn't at the meeting we went to! lol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Jul 2010 14:00 #6 by JMC

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Jul 2010 15:03 #7 by Wayne Harrison
I disagree. I think Buck can beat Michael Bennett. Buck can appeal more to Coloradoans than Bennett can. I'm voting for him, if he wins the primary.

Ninety-one percent of Republicans say they plan to vote in the primary, 52 percent have a favorable opinion of Buck and 45 percent have a favorable opinion of Norton, according to the poll done by Magellan Data and Mapping Strategies.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/201 ... ded/12222/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Jul 2010 15:10 #8 by JMC

Wayne Harrison wrote: I disagree. I think Buck can beat Michael Bennett. Buck can appeal more to Coloradoans than Bennett can. I'm voting for him, if he wins the primary.

Ninety-one percent of Republicans say they plan to vote in the primary, 52 percent have a favorable opinion of Buck and 45 percent have a favorable opinion of Norton, according to the poll done by Magellan Data and Mapping Strategies.

http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/201 ... ded/12222/


Dinner bet on that one Wayne.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Jul 2010 15:12 #9 by Wayne Harrison
Nope. Sorry. Political guesses prior to actual elections are just that: guesses. I still remember Viking the day before the November election talking about how McCain was going to win and how the polls were wrong.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jul 2010 00:12 #10 by Mr Peabody
I also was fence sitting on this one. Nortons pathetic attack ads made this an easy choice. I really do not want someone like Norton to represent me.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.147 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+