on that note wrote: Um, you bring up that a significant number of people that cannot even afford one snack for their kids are having kids....and what the school is feeding them is the problem to discuss? Shouldn't we focus all funding and efforts towards educating people what may happen to their and their kid's lives if they have them when they cannot even afford an extra snack for them each day.
Wait a minute... Are you suggesting that having too many kids is the problem? Are you suggesting that perhaps making birth control easier to obtain might cut down on the birth-rate? Are you suggesting that women (and yes, that includes married women) who find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy should be allowed to make the CHOICE to not carry it to term? And are you thinking that if "only you could get all those poor people (read: the 47%...) ti stop having so many children, that perhaps the number of 47% voters that "expect the gub'mint to take care of them" would be reduced?
Wow... What a target-rich environment all of THAT is... Please tell me that's what you meant!?!?!?
