The GOP’s Self-Delusion Syndrome

We'll see... Won't we...

Oh, did you happen to see the headline that says RMoney's disapproval rating is still worse than W's....?

I hope they continue to believe their own poll numbers... "Facts? We don' need no steenkin' facts..."

And the best part? RMoney's disaster, and the bat-crap-craziness of the teabaggers, is going to hurt the down-ballot races... Expect to lose more seats in the House & Senate...

Democracy4Sale wrote: We'll see... Won't we...

Oh, did you happen to see the headline that says RMoney's disapproval rating is still worse than W's....?

I hope they continue to believe their own poll numbers... "Facts? We don' need no steenkin' facts..."

And the best part? RMoney's disaster, and the bat-crap-craziness of the teabaggers, is going to hurt the down-ballot races... Expect to lose more seats in the House & Senate...

Obama has the vast majority of the press giving him free advertising plus attacking Romney at the same time. He better win!

I'd be happy to bet you when this is over. Obama can't lead, and will continue spending like a drunk sailor (no offense to drunk sailors). He can't help us cause he doesn't know how.

Democracy4Sale wrote: "What they don't say is that the Fox News polls are showing almost exactly the same thing," Blitzer said, reeling off a string of numbers. "...You don't hear them complaining about the Fox News polls. They're complaining about the others. So there's an imbalance there."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/2 ... 22393.html [/quote]
Given that even Fox news is relying solely on data from the 2008 election to weight their polls, I find it in no way surprising that they are coming up with roughly the same results as every other poll using the same data set to weight their polls. I'd be surprised, and even suspicious, if they were using the same data to weight their poll and they were coming out with different results. Please tell me the relevancy of pointing out that a poll conducted by a different enterprise that is using the same formula is coming up with similar results. Isn't that what is supposed to happen?

And in the end, I'm not voting for the Social Darwinism Party...

Fun to see that the sour-grapes mentality is already setting-in on the other side.

In 1988 Dukakis was leading Bush I in the polls by 7% in September and wound up losing. Ford was leading thus polls and lost to Carter. Keep the faith. Still three debates and October surprises to come.

Well, here's how enthusiastic the RMoney supporters are for the ticket... Even Joe Scarborough is impressed...!

[youtube:zz2cvb4r][/youtube:zz2cvb4r]


Hang in there, Joe... The folks here say that polls mean nothing, and you should "keep the faith." rofllol

Maybe Mittens can use that as one of his "zingers" he's planning to unleash in the debates? It's so much more important to have some zingers than anything like policy specifics about what you plan to do. And since we know he doesn't have any of those, then we can expect some of those well-rehearsed "zingers."