- Posts: 1507
- Thank you received: 0
FredHayek wrote: Would be nice if we could get a consistent man in office, right?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Thanks for the correction, his culpability was even worse than I had remembered. But hey he made up for it in the deaths of 80 or so Grenada forces and the 25 civilians killed at the mental hospital.Mary Scott wrote:
Is this like one of those LJ deflections? If so, you need to check your history first.Something the Dog Said wrote: You mean the way that Reagan took (not) responsibility for the deaths of the 183 Marines in Beirut? Nope, instead he pulled the survivors out, cut and ran, and then invaded Grenada, the smallest nation in the Western Hemisphere. That type of leadership?
In the attack on the American Marines barracks, the death toll was 241 American servicemen: 220 marines, 18 sailors and three soldiers,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beiru ... ks_bombing
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Then I guess he wasn't a true leader either.Something the Dog Said wrote:
Thanks for the correction, his culpability was even worse than I had remembered. But hey he made up for it in the deaths of 80 or so Grenada forces and the 25 civilians killed at the mental hospital.Mary Scott wrote:
Is this like one of those LJ deflections? If so, you need to check your history first.Something the Dog Said wrote: You mean the way that Reagan took (not) responsibility for the deaths of the 183 Marines in Beirut? Nope, instead he pulled the survivors out, cut and ran, and then invaded Grenada, the smallest nation in the Western Hemisphere. That type of leadership?
In the attack on the American Marines barracks, the death toll was 241 American servicemen: 220 marines, 18 sailors and three soldiers,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beiru ... ks_bombing
Point being, he did not take responsiblity for the deaths of the Marines as lionshead insisted a true leader would
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Then according to that criteria, we agree. Group hug?Something the Dog Said wrote: According to the criteria set forth by lionshead, nope.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I wasn't saying Mitt was consistent.Soulshiner wrote:
FredHayek wrote: Would be nice if we could get a consistent man in office, right?
Considering who you support, this is one of the funniest sentences ever posted on 285.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.