- Posts: 9964
- Thank you received: 8
towermonkey wrote: Didn't say it was a bad thing, but it does appear to be hypocritical at best. This guy portrays himself as a man of the oppressed and all that garbage. It's all smoke and mirrors. These guys are both corporate hacks who just represent different industries.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
archer wrote: [ Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nobody that matters wrote:
archer wrote: [ Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?
Nope. He's just trying to please enough people in key states to get his butt in the office. Then he'll try to keep just enough of them happy enough to re-elect him 4 years later. Then he won't care about 100% of the people, he'll just be trying to keep a reputation clean enough to be a desired public speaker pulling down obscene amounts of money for an hours worth of talking.
He's just like every other politician from both parties.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nobody that matters wrote:
archer wrote: [ Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?
Nope. He's just trying to please enough people in key states to get his butt in the office. Then he'll try to keep just enough of them happy enough to re-elect him 4 years later. Then he won't care about 100% of the people, he'll just be trying to keep a reputation clean enough to be a desired public speaker pulling down obscene amounts of money for an hours worth of talking.
He's just like every other politician from both parties.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Isn't it really like Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac? A private corporation partially funded by the goverment. Why should goverment only fund certain private stations? Sounds unfair to me. From what I read, the larger communities stations like KCFR get no goverment funding, but stations in rural areas get heaps. If the rural audience isn't watching, why should we be subsidizing it?towermonkey wrote: Why do we need PBS? I like it, but should the government be propping up a TV station? Maybe they should give up their 12 MHz frequency band to Verizon or AT&T. Why is the government in the broadcast business?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.