Do you want a president or a boss?

18 Oct 2012 10:37 #21 by archer

towermonkey wrote: Didn't say it was a bad thing, but it does appear to be hypocritical at best. This guy portrays himself as a man of the oppressed and all that garbage. It's all smoke and mirrors. These guys are both corporate hacks who just represent different industries.


That I can agree with...but if you read the posts here from many of the conservatives, Romney's business experience fighting for profits and business over the needs of employees is applauded...but mention Obama and going to court for his employer, and defending a business and you sounded like that is a bad thing. Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 10:43 #22 by Nobody that matters

archer wrote: [ Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?


Nope. He's just trying to please enough people in key states to get his butt in the office. Then he'll try to keep just enough of them happy enough to re-elect him 4 years later. Then he won't care about 100% of the people, he'll just be trying to keep a reputation clean enough to be a desired public speaker pulling down obscene amounts of money for an hours worth of talking.

He's just like every other politician from both parties.

"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 11:04 #23 by LadyJazzer

Nobody that matters wrote:

archer wrote: [ Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?


Nope. He's just trying to please enough people in key states to get his butt in the office. Then he'll try to keep just enough of them happy enough to re-elect him 4 years later. Then he won't care about 100% of the people, he'll just be trying to keep a reputation clean enough to be a desired public speaker pulling down obscene amounts of money for an hours worth of talking.

He's just like every other politician from both parties.


At least we agree about that...

We've already seen what he thinks of 47% of the population. The fact that he said it when he didn't think it was being captured, and only the "local audience" would hear tells you it's what he REALLY thinks, and not some focus-group tested blather. NOW he says he "cares about 100%" of the people... Uh-huh... And I've got a bridge to sell you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 11:53 #24 by The 500 Foundation
Actually I DO want a President...

it is just a damn shame the one we have
is, in reality, such a disconnected POS.

As for a Bosshole....I have already got waaay to many of those as it is
so I see no need for another one.

its looking like 4 more years of shit no matter which way you go.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 12:12 #25 by Pony Soldier

Nobody that matters wrote:

archer wrote: [ Now Romney portrays himself as fighting for 100% of Americans......should we believe him?


Nope. He's just trying to please enough people in key states to get his butt in the office. Then he'll try to keep just enough of them happy enough to re-elect him 4 years later. Then he won't care about 100% of the people, he'll just be trying to keep a reputation clean enough to be a desired public speaker pulling down obscene amounts of money for an hours worth of talking.

He's just like every other politician from both parties.


Are his lips moving?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 13:02 #26 by BearMtnHIB
Did anyone see Frontline last night? Interesting report on both Obama and Romney.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/choice-2012/#a

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 16:42 #27 by Raees
Wait, isn't Frontline on PBS?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Oct 2012 21:49 #28 by LadyJazzer
We don' need no steenkin' PBS....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2012 10:26 #29 by Pony Soldier
Why do we need PBS? I like it, but should the government be propping up a TV station? Maybe they should give up their 12 MHz frequency band to Verizon or AT&T. Why is the government in the broadcast business?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

19 Oct 2012 12:33 #30 by FredHayek

towermonkey wrote: Why do we need PBS? I like it, but should the government be propping up a TV station? Maybe they should give up their 12 MHz frequency band to Verizon or AT&T. Why is the government in the broadcast business?

Isn't it really like Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac? A private corporation partially funded by the goverment. Why should goverment only fund certain private stations? Sounds unfair to me. From what I read, the larger communities stations like KCFR get no goverment funding, but stations in rural areas get heaps. If the rural audience isn't watching, why should we be subsidizing it?

Back on topic?
Do I want a president or a boss?
I want a president who acts like a bauce instead of Obama, the Beta male.
rofllol

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.165 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+