Big Cat wrote: And its so obvious..Give poor people money and it goes right back into the economy, they'll spend every dime of it, but give rich people money and it sits in offshore tax sheltered accounts..Pure capitilism died in 1929 folks, ever since then the government has pumped billions a year into our economy every year to stasbilize it- So the choice is clear- You want the money going down the toilet in defense spending and into already filthy rich peoples bank accounts, or do you want the money spent in our communities in infrastructure investments and people buying consumer goods?
Thats the big difference between the two parties..
To reiterate
Foods stamps distribution boosts the economy more than just about anything else the government can do...It spreads money across the board to all kinds of businesses and communities while building another Aircraft carrier we don't need does virtually nothing for our economy...
In reality..We can't afford not to- The government is not going to stop proping up our economy with money so it all boils down to how do you want them to do it
Say it, say you want another aircraft carrier, say you want people like Mit Romney to have another 25 million/year in his bank accounts in a caribbean
And if Obama is re-elected, all will be wine and roses? Just look around and see the evidence of what this disaster of a president is doing. Like I said before, there will be only one positive with another four years of Obama... the proof of his failed ideology will be clear, even to most of the left wingers who have eyes.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
So it's best to let the poor and low income Americans starve Fred? I guess that really is the difference between the right and the left, and why I will never be a social conservative. I believe that we take care of our own in this country....that a nation is no better than how it treats the least of its citizens, that we do not give breaks to millionaires at the expense of other citizens.
archer wrote: So it's best to let the poor and low income Americans starve Fred? I guess that really is the difference between the right and the left, and why I will never be a social conservative. I believe that we take care of our own in this country....that a nation is no better than how it treats the least of its citizens, that we do not give breaks to millionaires at the expense of other citizens.
You won't be a fiscal conservative either... big surpprise there. And "the poor" will be better off if they can get jobs instead of living off the taxpayers. All the millionaires put together won't have enouggh money to give the poor a lifetime of prosperity, that only comes from a healthy economy.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
rofllol
