Alright, go ahead and ignore all the stuff about Obama promising to cut the deficit in half, and the $800 billion + spent to meet his projection of having unemployment at about 5.2% by now. Hey, it's only billions.
And regarding your point about his jobs bill. Even many Dems were not too excited about it...
But keep up your fictional claim that we would be so much better with it. Do you even know what it would cost vs. any jobs created? Especially considering the claims were exaggerated by almost 10X per this report?
Raees wrote: All right go ahead and ignore the OP.
OK I will address the original post. Romney and his advisors looked at how bad Obama has tanked this economy and now realizes it would be way too optomistic to promise 12 million jobs. (Just a wild assed guess on my part. )
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
"Jeep isn't moving all of its production to China"? LJ is happy that only some of the jobs are going to China. Obama'sAmerica, where lowered expectations is the norm.
Where 1% growth under Obama is making progress, but 2.7% growth under Bush in 2004 isn't enough.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
God, you are truly stupid... They're creating 1100 NEW JOBS in Ohio to start a new shift... What part of "NO JOBS ARE BEING MOVED TO CHINA" do you not get?
Oh, sorry... I forgot for a second who I was dealing with... My bad...
If you are starting production in Italy and China, instead of building new plants in America, jobs are moving overseas. Or do you think Fiat plans to send US hourly workers to build the Jeeps in China and Italy? Why if Romney does something like this you call it outsourcing, but when Fiat or GE does it, you are fine with it.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Of that 12 million claim (not that I support the claim), he has said 7 million would come from his tax reform. I'm thinking your picture got that confused with Romney's overall claim.
)
