LadyJazzer wrote: Your selective use of raw numbers which excluded mass-killing weapons classified as "pistols" didn't require an apology. You were dishonest, and you knew it.
Wanna try again?
It wasn't dishonest, I was trying to defend assault rifles and not all firearms. Assault rifles are bulky, expensive and most criminals and murderers prefer weapons that are light, cheap, and easy to conceal.
So all the Kabuki theatre going on right now about evil assault weapons is much ado about nothing. Saturday Night Specials are killing many more Americans than AR-15's, even with the Newtown outlier included.
If you look further down the list, more people are killed by unarmed assailants than with assault rifles.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
You didn't even provide a source for your b.s. You just copy-and-pasted it from the RIghtie echo-chamber. It'll be a cold day in he__ before I apologize to you for using unsourced material for your assertions.
FredHayek wrote: I do not make it out of thin air. I just receive a lot of news daily from a bunch of different sources and it is sometimes hard to remember exactly where. It is much easier to remember when you use only the unpaid bloggers(amateurs) from HuffPo to get your news.
Doesn't it ever bother you when you lie about another poster with nothing to back up your lie? I'll bet you read huffPo more than I do. If you go back over my posts, I rarely, if ever, cite Huffpo as my source unless they got it from another news source that is not perceived as a left wing source. Can't say the same for you......google does work....if you "know" something, but have no proof to give that it isn't made up out of thin air, then take a minute and google it.
Your credibility is shot Fred......you have posted over and over again "facts" that have no source other than your post. You categorically refuse to do anything to find out if what you have stated as fact is even remotely true. When asked for a source you resort to insulting the poster who had the gall to ask you....that isn't discussion. You may think you are the smartest poster so you don't need to present any stinkin' proof.....but news flash......you aren't. I would trust information from VL as being more likely to be true than what you post.
Curious what archer and LJ think about Gore's business deal here and if it was Romney, would it had been an issue during the election. Sorry to attempt getting back on topic.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
It cracks me up that Al Gore tried like all get out to see the deal done before the end of year. Now he gets to pay more taxes.
IN NOVEMBER 2014, WE HAVE A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY TO CLEAN OUT THE ENTIRE HOUSE AND ONE-THIRD OF THE SENATE! DONT BLOW IT!
“When white man find land, Indians running it, no taxes, no debt, plenty buffalo, plenty beaver, clean water. Women did all the work, Medicine man free. Indian man spend all day hunting and fishing; all night having sex. Only whit man dumb enough to think he could improve system like that.” Indian Chief Two Eagles
Buh-bye. 
