Benghazi Survivors

The South Carolina senator said he’s “had contact” with some of the survivors, calling their story “chilling.” He told Fox News that "the bottom line is they feel that they can't come forth, they've been told to be quiet."
The White House is denying any attempt to exert pressure on the surviving victims.

[youtube:18b41vul][/youtube:18b41vul]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03 ... istration/

Why is access to the survivors not readily available?

I think the answer to your question is way to obvious.

Yeppers.
The real question for me......what is really going on that they feel HAS TO BE hidden from the public.
It has gone past elections at this point.

A recommended recent book addressing the details: "Benghazi - The Definitive Report" by Brandon Webb. THE responsibility for the murders is IMHO Hillary Clinton......possibly the next POTUS if the American people are really that foolish after Slick Willy.

IMHO IF the truth were told 912/2012....Obama may heve been canned along with Clinton....thus the cover-up......Carter lost for lessor misstakes........they were wetting panties.......Clinton may yet wear this set of murders.....

deltamrey wrote: A recommended recent book addressing the details: "Benghazi - The Definitive Report" by Brandon Webb. THE responsibility for the murders is IMHO Hillary Clinton......possibly the next POTUS if the American people are really that foolish after Slick Willy.

IMHO IF the truth were told 912/2012....Obama may heve been canned along with Clinton....thus the cover-up......Carter lost for lessor misstakes........they were wetting panties.......Clinton may yet wear this set of murders.....

But the only way the people can get the truth is through the media... so it's highly unlikely that Benghazi will hurt Clinton and I doubt most history books will tell the true story either.

IF you really believe the media projects the truth......you are being fooled like many Sheep Americans. Next reading assignment: "Necessary Illusions - Thought Control In Democratic Socities" by Noam Chomsky...........

Clintons hope this fades away by 2015.......just as the CO legislators hope the attack on the Second will be forgottn by summer 2014........NOT.

Since the "survivors" were CIA clandestine operators, why would it be normal policy for those individuals to discuss their acts in public media sources?

I don't know that CIA operatives need to testify to the media or publicly but there is a mechanism in the house or senate to testify privately in a classified setting.
The issue at hand is that those people have indicated that they have been told to keep quiet.
I would like to know why.
This isn't about the election anymore. Obama won. There has to be something much bigger that the Obama Administration does not want the public to know.
Gun running?.....who knows what.
Whatever it is, it cannot be good for this administration.

frogger wrote: I don't know that CIA operatives need to testify to the media or publicly but there is a mechanism in the house or senate to testify privately in a classified setting.
The issue at hand is that those people have indicated that they have been told to keep quiet.
I would like to know why.
This isn't about the election anymore. Obama won. There has to be something much bigger that the Obama Administration does not want the public to know.
Gun running?.....who knows what.
Whatever it is, it cannot be good for this administration.

There is a procedure under the Select Intelligence committee who are made up of representatives have the appropriate clearances. Those tend not to be media happy congressman more interested in getting the political spotlight rather than serving the interests of their country.

your point STDS?
Why are these survivors not allowed to talk to ANYONE?