Here's a fun one to discuss... maybe conspiracy theory, maybe fact, maybe utter bullshit and maybe it just doesn't matter... you tell me. I figured it would be a fun one cuz it's on Glenn Beck's The Blaze and we know what an evil guy he is :VeryScared:
I'm just gonna sit back and watch/learn. State your position (if ya ain't scurd)
The Saudi national who was initially a “person of interest” in the Boston bombings was placed on a “no-fly list,” or a terror watch list, after he was detained and before federal authorities determined whether he was involved in the attack or just a mere witness, an official with the Department of Homeland Security told TheBlaze.
Several questions, however, remain unanswered. For example, why was Alharbi flagged under section 212, 3B if officials determined he played no role in the Boston bombings? What evidence were federal officials in possession of that caused the terrorist label? Is there something else in Alharbi’s file? The burden of proof required to file a 3B is significant, according to sources familiar with law enforcement protocols.
So you're both saying this is a non-story... did you read it? I still don't have an opinion on it cuz it looks to hinky to believe, but I have a buddy that's convinced Beck is right on this. I agree Beck is a drama queen and does seem to use that for his financial benefit so we'll see if this becomes anything.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Rick wrote: So you're both saying this is a non-story... did you read it?.......
I did not read it. I do not know if it is a non-story, I have not payed enough attention to even know what the story is.
If there is something here I am pretty sure it will intrude on my consciousness from multiple sources. Until then it is just not on my radar.
In my limited experience with Glen Beck people, they come from the religious side of the tent. I am elsewhere.
Well I posted it so I could get opinions on the article, I already know Beck can be a loose nut, but he has been right many times too. It's not that long a read and it does bring up some interesting questions.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
No, I read it. There is probably some truth to the story but how much is truth and how much is over sensationalized to get people all twisted up? I'll stand by my statement that Glen Beck in an entertainer
before a patriot. His bank account is his first concern. Keeping people twisted up keeps them listening and the money rolling in. David Sirota is no different just a different crowd to cater to.
gmule wrote: No, I read it. There is probably some truth to the story but how much is truth and how much is over sensationalized to get people all twisted up? I'll stand by my statement that Glen Beck in an entertainer
before a patriot. His bank account is his first concern. Keeping people twisted up keeps them listening and the money rolling in. David Sirota is no different just a different crowd to cater to.
Well, if someone can tell me what parts of the story are bullshit, that would be a good start. Just saying the guy is a greedy entertainer is a cop out and doesn't answer my question.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
gmule wrote: No, I read it. There is probably some truth to the story but how much is truth and how much is over sensationalized to get people all twisted up? I'll stand by my statement that Glen Beck in an entertainer
before a patriot. His bank account is his first concern. Keeping people twisted up keeps them listening and the money rolling in. David Sirota is no different just a different crowd to cater to.
Well, if someone can tell me what parts of the story are bullsh**, that would be a good start. Just saying the guy is a greedy entertainer is a cop out and doesn't answer my question.
There are no facts in that oped piece other than a DHS person said..... How can you go off on a tangent on just someones opinion? There are no names as to who said what so how can it be verified?
gmule wrote: No, I read it. There is probably some truth to the story but how much is truth and how much is over sensationalized to get people all twisted up? I'll stand by my statement that Glen Beck in an entertainer
before a patriot. His bank account is his first concern. Keeping people twisted up keeps them listening and the money rolling in. David Sirota is no different just a different crowd to cater to.
Well, if someone can tell me what parts of the story are bullsh**, that would be a good start. Just saying the guy is a greedy entertainer is a cop out and doesn't answer my question.
There are no facts in that oped piece other than a DHS person said..... How can you go off on a tangent on just someones opinion? There are no names as to who said what so how can it be verified?
the whole story smells of bs to me
See, now that wasn't so hard was it? :thumbsup:
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
