Well, let me know if Stalin ever runs for office again...
In the meantime, you can't possibly imagine how much I don't care about your John-Birch-Society-revisionist-history of the world and the number of people killed because of capitalist wars.
LadyJazzer wrote: Since the deaths on Obama's "watch" wouldn't have happened if it hadn't of been for The Shrub's phony, immoral, unnecessary, unpaid-for war that he started in the first place, I'll let those count against the one who started it...
"The Afghan people need our troops and your troops, our support and your support... to defeat the Taliban and Al Qaeda, to develop their economy and to help them rebuild their nation"
Barack Obama
[youtube:166jjdpb][/youtube:166jjdpb]
How soon we forget...
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
LadyJazzer wrote: Since the deaths on Obama's "watch" wouldn't have happened if it hadn't of been for The Shrub's phony, immoral, unnecessary, unpaid-for war that he started in the first place, I'll let those count against the one who started it...
If the best you've got is that "After YOUR guy ran the car into the ditch, the guy that followed him isn't getting it out of the ditch fast enough to suit you", then,
:rofllol
Wasn't it Obama who called the war in Afghanistan the "War of Necessity" when he started running for the presidency in 2006? Isn't that the one he called just and moral? And wasn't it on his "watch" that the CIA was allowed to run a phony vaccination campaign in the search for bin Laden's DNA so that he could succeed where Bush failed as he campaigned for reelection?
LadyJazzer wrote: Well, let me know if Stalin ever runs for office again...
In the meantime, you can't possibly imagine how much I don't care about your John-Birch-Society-revisionist-history of the world and the number of people killed because of capitalist wars.
:Snooze
Capitalist wars? Democrat wars are more like it. Check your history..
deltamrey wrote: This is a very transparent issue and can be understood looking at what happened to Jimmy "Peanut cakes" Carter when IRAN held almost 100 diplomats for two years while he BS'ed the American People. HE LOST his second election....canned, terminated (Regan used the issue to shred the Democrats) then got them out post haste.
Iran held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days from November 1979 to January 1981. Carter did not BS the American People for two years...at that time, as with a lot of government ops we (the American people) didn't know the full story. Now, after 34 years we know more of the story and if you research that whole debacle, you will find that there are a lot of people to blame. How about blaming Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller for vetoeing President Carter's decision not to allow The Shah to get medical treatment in America? How about blaming any of our intelligence community for not seeing that the Iranian students who eventually took over the Embassy and took the Americans hostage were scoping out how the Embassy Marine guards worked? How about blaming the State Department for not getting all Americans out of country after the first invasion of the Embassy? How about blaming the military for not thinking that the desert sand/dust would harm the hydraulics on the aircraft sent in to rescue the hostages? How about blaming the military for kicking up the sandstorm that ended up killing American military members? How about giving credit to the Algerians for helping to broker the release? And for the patience and length of time it took? How about blaming the Ayatollah for telling us what he wanted from us in ransom to get the hostages released, but then every time that ransom was "paid", adding to that ransom?
Carter took the fall because he was the President...had it been Ford or Reagan or any other President and the circumstances were the same...they, too would have taken the fall. The release of the hostages occurred coincidentally with Reagan's inauguration...the movement had been in the works for months.
Bengazi: I will not deny that there was information that should have caused more movement so as to possibly save the lives of the four persons killed during this attack. Nor will I deny that the information given after the attack may have been misleading or downright incorrect. But, the American people will never know the whole story regarding that unfortunate happening. Not because the politicians are hiding anything, but because releasing all of the information could hurt Americans in the future by giving away too much about how we operate.
One thing I will say is that American certainly does not learn from its mistakes...
This is it then. End of story, nothing to see here. Move along.
"Asked by host David Gregory if she had any regrets, the former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. said no.
“Because what I said to you that morning and what I did every day since was to share the best information that I had at the time. The information I provided, which I explained to you was what I had at the moment. It could change,” she said.
“I commented that this was based on what I knew on that morning was provided to me and my colleagues and indeed to Congress by the intelligence community, and that’s been well validated in many different ways since.”
She acknowledged that some of her comments have since been disproven.
“And that information turned out in some respects not to be 100 percent correct, but the notion that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people is patently false, and I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.”
Ms. Rice also claimed that President Obama is determined to capture those who killed the Americans in the attack.
“The investigation is ongoing and it has indeed made progress, but the point is we will get the perpetrators,” said Ms. Rice. “We will say on it until it gets done.”
“And that information turned out in some respects not to be 100 percent correct, but the notion that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people is patently false, and I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.”
:LMAO: More like that information was 0% correct. The fact is the administration sent someone out who had ZERO clue as to what happened and only said what they wanted her to say. Clinton just didn't want to dirty her hands with this fable... a true coward.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
