Isn't it amazing that after 5 weeks when it became obvious that it was just another Issa/Republi-Klux-Klan waltz down a blind alley, he was saying something different:
WASHINGTON -- Officials at the Internal Revenue Service were encouraged to flag groups with the word "emerge" in their names as well as potential successors to the anti-poverty organization ACORN, according to documents released by Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday.
The documents add another complicated layer to the ongoing (albeit diminished) controversy surrounding the IRS screening of Tea Party groups in 2010 and 2011. They also take additional steam out of the Republican Party's insistence that the tax agency was politically motivated against conservative groups when it considered whether or not to grant tax-exempt, 501(c)(4) status.
Groups with the word "emerge" in the name tend to lean more Democratic. As The New York Times previously reported, three such organizations -- Emerge Nevada, Emerge Maine and Emerge Massachusetts -- all were denied tax-exempt status because the IRS determined that they existed strictly to benefit Democratic candidates.
"Once again it is clear that the Inspector General's report left out critical information that skewed the audit's findings and set the stage for Republicans to make completely baseless accusations in an effort to tarnish the White House..."
Wow... Still trying to sell that stale Kool-Aid?... Isn't it interesting what you can come up with when you try to take one clip out of a whole sequence of things and make a big deal out of it... (Sort of reminds me of the NRA wackos taking the earliest on-the-scene 911 calls at the Newtown Massacre, and trying to use them to imply a whole "conspiracy theory"...)
Did you hear about the one where 30% of the mental-giants of the Republican/TeaBagger Party in Louisiana blame Obama for the failures of the Katrina disaster? (Three years BEFORE he even took office?) Oh, wait... Those are the same mental-giants that passed laws to force creationism into their classrooms... My bad....
LadyJazzer wrote: Hmmm, that was on May 15, 2013...
Isn't it amazing that after 5 weeks when it became obvious that it was just another Issa/Republi-Klux-Klan waltz down a blind alley, he was saying something different:
WASHINGTON -- Officials at the Internal Revenue Service were encouraged to flag groups with the word "emerge" in their names as well as potential successors to the anti-poverty organization ACORN, according to documents released by Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday.
The documents add another complicated layer to the ongoing (albeit diminished) controversy surrounding the IRS screening of Tea Party groups in 2010 and 2011. They also take additional steam out of the Republican Party's insistence that the tax agency was politically motivated against conservative groups when it considered whether or not to grant tax-exempt, 501(c)(4) status.
Groups with the word "emerge" in the name tend to lean more Democratic. As The New York Times previously reported, three such organizations -- Emerge Nevada, Emerge Maine and Emerge Massachusetts -- all were denied tax-exempt status because the IRS determined that they existed strictly to benefit Democratic candidates.
"Once again it is clear that the Inspector General's report left out critical information that skewed the audit's findings and set the stage for Republicans to make completely baseless accusations in an effort to tarnish the White House..."
Wow... Still trying to sell that stale Kool-Aid?... Isn't it interesting what you can come up with when you try to take one clip out of a whole sequence of things and make a big deal out of it... (Sort of reminds me of the NRA wackos taking the earliest on-the-scene 911 calls at the Newtown Massacre, and trying to use them to imply a whole "conspiracy theory"...)
Did you hear about the one where 30% of the mental-giants of the Republican/TeaBagger Party in Louisiana blame Obama for the failures of the Katrina disaster? (Three years BEFORE he even took office?) Oh, wait... Those are the same mental-giants that passed laws to force creationism into their classrooms... My bad....
Wow... "No evidence"...as purported by "TheGatewayPundit".... Imagine that. And I'll bet WorldNutDaily and "DailyCaller" don't think so either...
That would be the same "Jim Holt" that says "Common Core education principles" is "Communist Indoctrination"; The same "Jim Holt" who has more conspiracy theories than Alex Jones' "InfoWars"; who can't put a sentence together without the word "Benghazi" in it..... Yeah, I'm impressed. Another knuckle-dragger who snowed another 285 teabagger with his b.s., (which isn't hard to do.--They ain't the brightest bulbs in the package.) Gee, Bob, nice to see the Republi-Klux-Klan is ever-vigilant on-the-job for low-intelligence clowns.
I stand by my stories, I stand by my comments, and you can feel free to put your right-wing mental-giant's denials in the usual trashbin. You haven't proved anything except that you're capable of being snowed by a right-winger's blog writings.
IRS hearing explodes, Republicans inch toward contempt
Republicans are inching toward a vote to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress after fireworks erupted at a House hearing on the tea party targeting on Wednesday.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/i ... 04293.html
Mark Steyn on "the government of the United States is corrupt"
The Lois Lerner Defense
File it the next time the IRS calls you up.
By Mark Steyn
...Whatever. Let’s take it as read that, when U.S. taxpayers wind up giving tax breaks to an entity linked to the butchers of Darfur, it’s pure coincidence that the racket turns out to be run by the president’s brother. Let’s accept that Malik Obama just got lucky that his letter landed on the desk of Lois Lerner, and that, when she backdated his application for two-and-a-half years, she’d momentarily forgotten that it’s illegal for her to backdate it more than two-and-a-quarter years. Indeed, let’s take the president at his word that the existence of this shadowy IRS entity working deep within the even shadowier U.S. Treasury planted in deep cover within the shadowiest conspiracy of them all, this murky hitherto unknown organization called “the Executive Branch,” that all this was news to him. What that means then is not that this or that elected politician is corrupt but that the government of the United States is corrupt....
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/3 ... mark-steyn
If the IRS did nothing wrong why is she pleading the 5th? If you were being investigated and were innocent wouldn't you want to have your full say before Congress on tape?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Looks like she just wrote her own contempt ticket. She can respond to the Dept of Justice with a full interview, when last I checked was part of the government but can't/won't before Congress? Looks like she gave up her 5th amendment right. Send her butt to jail for a long time.
Yes, of course, and we KNOW that Darrell "Torquemada" Issa would give her a "fair and balanced" hearing, don't we? He's proved that in the last few days with the way he treated Elijah Cummings, and the fact that a complaint was lodged to remove him from his chairmanship... Sure sounds like someone I'd want to "open up to"....
:rofllol :LMAO:
If it were me, I'd tell him to "stuff it" too...
She can do like Rick Scott and just take the 5th 95 times, and if Issa's got the proof, let him produce it... (Which he can't...)