Mao's Great Leap Forward 'killed 45 million in four years'

You mean like the knowledge that Chicom is a Rush Limbaugh label? Or the knowledge that the Machin-Toomey bill contained language which prevented the entire federal government from compiling a list of guns owned by individuals? How about the knowledge that the man with the 132+ lb scrotum ended up that way because he couldn't afford healthcare?

Regurgitation of fact-free "progressive" talking points is what should be sounding stupid to your ears VL, not someone correctly pointing out that this is what they are doing through the same use of talking points. Wayne might not care much for being treated in a manner consistent with his behavior, but that should serve as an incentive to alter that behavior. If he, or you for that matter, wishes to have an actual discussion instead of sling slogans back and forth, I can certainly accomodate you there as well.

Chicom I heard long before Rush Limbaugh. Ever study history? I do think Stalin and Mao have been treated better than Hitler. Part of that is that Hitler's genocide was better documented and America helped end it. We passively stood aside and coverage was minimal. Ever see the mass Chinese graves? Starving Ukrainians? Gulag pictures?

FredHayek wrote: We passively stood aside and coverage was minimal. Ever see the mass Chinese graves? Starving Ukrainians? Gulag pictures?

What a stupid thing to say..."We passively stood aside" back in the 1920's? What were we supoposed to do, invade Russia and make them behave? Who do you think we are?

And instead of passively standing aside maybe we should have invaded China, huh Fred?

We couldn't even hold the korean peninsula after WW2..Remember? The Korean war? China (Mao with Stalin's help) entered the war and pushed American and South Korean units into the sea..Our boys were running for thier lives...Yeah, we just passively stood aside Fred-What an insult to my father and the other 100's of thousands of people that fought and died in that war..Its called History Fred, look into it-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3kdxl4rq2o

Vice Lord wrote:

Conservative Voice wrote: Wow, congrats, PS. You got to use "low information" "progressive' and "echo chamber" talking points in one sentence.

You know PrintSmith, Wayne is right-knowledge is a lot more than just the ability to memorize bumber stickers and catchy slogans. I know some of the good ones leave indelible impressions on you, but to most of us it just sounds stupid hearing you repeat them over and over and over like a myna bird.


#Sloganeer

PrintSmith wrote: Regurgitation of fact-free "progressive" talking points is what should be sounding stupid to your ears VL, not someone correctly pointing out that this is what they are doing through the same use of talking points. Wayne might not care much for being treated in a manner consistent with his behavior, but that should serve as an incentive to alter that behavior. If he, or you for that matter, wishes to have an actual discussion instead of sling slogans back and forth, I can certainly accomodate you there as well.

You write big long messages that seem like canned responses...I was in a foriegn country recently and the only english speaking channel there was FOX News, It was so negative and so depressing that after a few weeks I wasn't sure if America would still be there upon my return...I remember thinking "Oh, this is where they get all this sh**, this is why they are so afraid...

I feel the same way when I read your postings PS

So I rarely read them, and i'm sure i'm not the only one

#Mr.Doomn Gloom

I'd be happy if PS would dispense with an ad hominem attack in almost every response and just argue the point. He has this need to constantly point out how superior his intellect is.

Conservative Voice wrote: I'd be happy if PS would dispense with an ad hominem attack in almost every response and just argue the point. He has this need to constantly point out how superior his intellect is.

His long winded postings indicate a desperate need to be viewed as intelligent, but when you break it all down its bumper sticker slogans smothered in a bunch of pretentious babble

#Phoney

Vice Lord wrote:

FredHayek wrote: We passively stood aside and coverage was minimal. Ever see the mass Chinese graves? Starving Ukrainians? Gulag pictures?

What a stupid thing to say..."We passively stood aside" back in the 1920's? What were we supoposed to do, invade Russia and make them behave? Who do you think we are?

And instead of passively standing aside maybe we should have invaded China, huh Fred?

We couldn't even hold the korean peninsula after WW2..Remember? The Korean war? China (Mao with Stalin's help) entered the war and pushed American and South Korean units into the sea..Our boys were running for thier lives...Yeah, we just passively stood aside Fred-What an insult to my father and the other 100's of thousands of people that fought and died in that war..Its called History Fred, look into it-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3kdxl4rq2o

I wasn't advocating us getting involved I was just stating a fact. If you had read your history VL you would know US troops were stationed in Russia after WWI and were supporting anti-communist forces. One reason Stalin always distrusted us.

The fact is that we didn't stand by passively..Korea, Viet Nam, the Cold War

All wars against Russia and China

#HonorthesacrificeinBloodn Treasure

However, we DID stand by passively during the genocide in Rwanda. And yes, that was Clinton.

http://allafrica.com/stories/201303150034.html

Conservative Voice wrote: And yes, that was Clinton.

he was one of the best republican presidents we ever had...A lot like Obama



http://lmgtfy.com/?q=NAFTA+Ruined+America