- Posts: 9964
- Thank you received: 8
How is that any different than arguing with an Obama hater.....they'll hate anything he does no matter if it's right, wrong or indifferent. Oh wait....it is different.....LJ and I both disagree with Obama on this, and aren't the least bit afraid to state that......otisptoadwater wrote: My advice, don't argue with an Obamabot. They'll justify anything he does no mater if it's right, wrong, or indifferent.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Unnecessary accordong to whom? You with your guano infested gray matter? You're kidding, right? You mean the two "contingency operations" that were both approved, and funded, by Congress? Are you including the one the current executive described as "The War of Necessity" while campaigning to be the next commander in chief? Evidently the majority of the duly elected representatives of the citizens of the States do not share the extreme opinions you are expressing here.LadyJazzer wrote: Oh, and the cost of Shrub's two unnecessary, unpaid-for wars based on LIES and COOKED-Intelligence, is approximately $4-TRILLION....
Indeed they are. Especially for the current executive.LadyJazzer wrote:
Oh, and did you hear?... Oil price per barrel under Bush highest was $147.00 gas was $4.15.deltamrey wrote: Oil has topped $110/barrel .......... now who really wins:
Did you hear that the average price per gallon for the summer of 2012 was higher than it was during the summer of 2008? Did you know that the price per gallon was over a dollar per gallon more than it was in 2007 even though our consumption was 500K barrels less per day? You do realize, don't you, that there is a difference between a temporary price spike, like what you babbling on about, and the sustained period of time that prices have been high under this president, right? Your gray matter hasn't become so guano infested yet that you are incapable of discerning the difference in the economic impact of sustained high prices compared to a period of two or three months, right?LadyJazzer wrote: Dang... FACTS are a b*tch, aren't they?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
pineinthegrass wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote:
pineinthegrass wrote: Has a Nobel Peace Prize winner ever before committed an act of war after winning the prize?
lol Drives you crazy, don't it?... :rofllol
Obama gets the Nobel Peace Prize, and all the Idiot Son gets is an old shoe:
[youtube:1lh011li][/youtube:1lh011li]
Oh, and the cost of Shrub's two unnecessary, unpaid-for wars based on LIES and COOKED-Intelligence, is approximately $4-TRILLION....
deltamrey wrote: Oil has topped $110/barrel .......... now who really wins:
Oh, and did you hear?... Oil price per barrel under Bush highest was $147.00 gas was $4.15.
Dang... FACTS are a b*tch, aren't they?
As I recall, you used to be someone who could actually discuss things back in the earlier days.
Now you are just a serial cut and paste person, and you keep cut and pasting the same stuff over and over, plus add your insults to match.
You've already at least said that you wouldn't support bombing Syria, glad you made that clear.
So let me ask you, if Obama commits an act of war by bombing Syria, should he give his Nobel Peace Prize back?
Or am I just going to get your boring cut and paste blogs, charts, and photos regurgitated over and over again?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.