corruption in Philadelphia

Hmmm. Maybe I should have put this with the cover up of Reid's corruption. There they are willing to let a pub to slide to keep Reid off the hook.

http://articles.philly.com/2014-03-17/n ... n-kane-ali


"Kane shut down sting that snared Phila. officials

By Angela Couloumbis and Craig R. McCoy, Inquirer Staff Writers
POSTED: March 17, 2014
The Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office ran an undercover sting operation over three years that captured leading Philadelphia Democrats, including four members of the city's state House delegation, on tape accepting money, The Inquirer has learned.

Yet no one was charged with a crime."...

Prosecutors began the sting in 2010 when Republican Tom Corbett was attorney general. After Democrat Kathleen G. Kane took office in 2013, she shut it down.

A) I don't see any mention of Harry Reid there... Perhaps you can point me to the non-existent link?

You seem to be OK with Christie as long as he isn't actually convicted; you seem to be OK with Rick Scott, who "took the Fifth" 95 times, and while not convicted, his company payed up the largest single fine to the Feds for Medicare fraud ($1.7 BILLION), and forced him to resign from the board....(Some sources say he admitted to 14 counts...Hmmmm.....

Gee, I could on and on...But it seems the outrage-of-the-day "secret word" is "Harry Reid", and that must be the goal: use the words "Harry Reid" in a sentence... Let me know if they actually find anything he's guilty of---(other than p*ssing off the teabaggers...)

It also seems that unless a Republican does the perp-walk into the prison, that's a "pass" for you guys; but if Dem has a Tea-Nazi mention him in a derogatory way, that's grounds for impeachment, or at the very least, storming the castle with torches and pitchforks.

Gee, Bob. Another slow news day ? (Maybe you need to crank up your own private little source-free, fact-free echo-chamber for the kiddies?)

LadyJazzer wrote: A) I don't see any mention of Harry Reid there... Perhaps you can point me to the non-existent link?

You seem to be OK with Christie as long as he isn't actually convicted; you seem to be OK with Rick Scott, who "took the Fifth" 95 times, and while not convicted, his company payed up the largest single fine to the Feds for Medicare fraud ($1.7 BILLION), and forced him to resign from the board....(Some sources say he admitted to 14 counts...Hmmmm.....

Gee, I could on and on...But it seems the outrage-of-the-day "secret word" is "Harry Reid", and that must be the goal: use the words "Harry Reid" in a sentence... Let me know if they actually find anything he's guilty of---(other than p*ssing off the teabaggers...)

It also seems that unless a Republican does the perp-walk into the prison, that's a "pass" for you guys; but if Dem has a Tea-Nazi mention him in a derogatory way, that's grounds for impeachment, or at the very least, storming the castle with torches and pitchforks.

Gee, Bob. Another slow news day ? (Maybe you need to crank up your own private little source-free, fact-free echo-chamber for the kiddies?)

Three strikes and you're out Lady Jazzer.

A) When BB said "Maybe I should have put this with the cover up of Reid's corruption" he was referring to another thread here ( http://mymountaintown.com/forums/the-courthouse/31281 ). He never said this article had anything to do with Reid.

This article has nothing to do with Christy. I don't see any mention of Christy here.

C) You're still a bigot.

(Reading is comprehension Lady Jazzer)

Reverend Revelant wrote: (Reading is comprehension Lady Jazzer)

She doesn't require comprehension in order to post her monotonous ridicule and "they did it too" deflections.

Reverend Revelant wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: A) I don't see any mention of Harry Reid there... Perhaps you can point me to the non-existent link?

You seem to be OK with Christie as long as he isn't actually convicted; you seem to be OK with Rick Scott, who "took the Fifth" 95 times, and while not convicted, his company payed up the largest single fine to the Feds for Medicare fraud ($1.7 BILLION), and forced him to resign from the board....(Some sources say he admitted to 14 counts...Hmmmm.....

Gee, I could on and on...But it seems the outrage-of-the-day "secret word" is "Harry Reid", and that must be the goal: use the words "Harry Reid" in a sentence... Let me know if they actually find anything he's guilty of---(other than p*ssing off the teabaggers...)

It also seems that unless a Republican does the perp-walk into the prison, that's a "pass" for you guys; but if Dem has a Tea-Nazi mention him in a derogatory way, that's grounds for impeachment, or at the very least, storming the castle with torches and pitchforks.

Gee, Bob. Another slow news day ? (Maybe you need to crank up your own private little source-free, fact-free echo-chamber for the kiddies?)

Three strikes and you're out Lady Jazzer.

A) When BB said "Maybe I should have put this with the cover up of Reid's corruption" he was referring to another thread here ( http://mymountaintown.com/forums/the-courthouse/31281 ). He never said this article had anything to do with Reid.

This article has nothing to do with Christy. I don't see any mention of Christy here.

C) You're still a bigot.

(Reading is comprehension Lady Jazzer)

She doesn't have to worry about comprehending your post RR, her delicate eyes are shielded from facts most of the time by the ignore feature.

Just goes to show you every election is important, especially AG and Sec'y of State.
Not prosecuting corruption helped Detroit go bankrupt even faster.

FredHayek wrote: Exactly. If you want to dispute this, you could say the new AG Kane found out the charges were partisan in origin and decided to withdraw them, you don't just run right into the weeds and neighboring states trying to deflect. Of course Philly is the city that wasn't embarrased to have voting fraud so blatant that Mitt Romney didn't get a vote in 20 precincts. (Talk about your vote not mattering! Putin must be jealous.)

Catch up. Kane skipped partisan and went directly to racist. Corrupt politicians are not new but at least they used to act embarrassed and the rest shocked. The caught went to jail and the rest swore to change the system to make corruption harder. I believe we called it the rule of law.

Now they are brazenly plutocratic and many shrug and say "Well at least they are our plutocrats".

BlazerBob wrote: Hmmm. Maybe I should have put this with the cover up of Reid's corruption. There they are willing to let a pub to slide to keep Reid off the hook.

Deflect much? All of which deflects from the questions:

A) I don't see any mention of Harry Reid there... Perhaps you can point me to the non-existent link?

You seem to be OK with Christie as long as he isn't actually convicted; you seem to be OK with Rick Scott, who "took the Fifth" 95 times, and while not convicted, his company payed up the largest single fine to the Feds for Medicare fraud ($1.7 BILLION), and forced him to resign from the board....(Some sources say he admitted to 14 counts...Hmmmm.....) ; oh, and there's David Vitter, and.....

Gee, I could on and on...But it seems the outrage-of-the-day "secret word" is "Harry Reid", and that must be the goal: use the words "Harry Reid" in a sentence and the "duck comes down and gives you $100"... Let me know if they actually find anything he's guilty of---(other than p*ssing off the teabaggers...)

It also seems that unless a Republican does the perp-walk into the prison, that's a "pass" for you guys; but if Dem has a Tea-Nazi mention him in a derogatory way, that's grounds for impeachment, or at the very least, storming the castle with torches and pitchforks.

Gee, Bob. Another slow news day ? (Maybe you need to crank up your own private little source-free, fact-free echo-chamber for the kiddies?)

Well, darlin', you keep slinging the poop up there...Maybe some day something will stick.

Insert standard LJ-Derangement-Syndrome personal-attack crap and deflect from the questions here: _____

LadyJazzer wrote:
Deflect much? All of which deflects from the questions:

Isn't it cute when she has everyone but Fred on ignore, and she rattles on talking to herself because she hasn't seen anyone else's replies?

Reverend Revelant wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote:
Deflect much? All of which deflects from the questions:

Isn't it cute when she has everyone but Fred on ignore, and she rattles on talking to herself because she hasn't seen anyone else's replies?

Actually, seeing such a closed a mind makes me a little sad.

But I'll get over it.