Now that Benghazi is back at the forefront in Congress, the usual suspects have gone silent. Is it that no one has told them what to say to put a positive spin on American deaths and cover ups? Maybe they would rather comment on the racist left protesting at Rutgers over Condolezza Rice.
The new talking points are conservatives don't care about thousands of dead GI's but these four are more important. Personally I care about an administration who would rather lie than tell the truth.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Or...it's a gorgeous day outside after the forums were down for a few hours with a server migration and everyone's outside enjoying themselves!
I'm watching DU Men's Lacrosse kick Villanova's ass while hanging out at Brooks Place Tav, sipping on a mint julep.
How'd your house remodel go Heartless? That was what you were working on a while back, right?
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
FredHayek wrote: The new talking points are conservatives don't care about thousands of dead GI's but these four are more important. Personally I care about an administration who would rather lie than tell the truth.
Yeah, me too... We're still wondering about those non-existent WMD's, the yellow-cake uranium, and who REALLY outed a covert CIA agent because her husband wouldn't cover for them... And yeah, I think 4,781 US dead, 130,000 wounded, because of one clown's obsession with starting an unnecessary, unpaid-for war, ARE more important than four who were at the wrong place at the wrong time.
(Not to mention the 241 that died in the barracks at Beirut... Where was the outrage there? Saint Reagan was on the job...)
Those are not "new" talking-points...Those have been around since the Idiot Son allowed the World Trade Center to be bombed in 2001.
You missed the Nixon cover up. Not that the past has any relevance to the current corrupt administration. But nice (and always expected) deflection. The chemical weapons used by "Chemical Ali" were both fact and WMDs. And now we need to have funding (ie. unpaid for war) before entering a war? Wrong place at the wrong time, do you think they were on vacation there?
No more delusional than the witch hunt to come up with something more on Benghazi than has already been beaten to death...That's a delusional opinion too.
Funny...This hasn't changed: We're still wondering about those non-existent WMD's, the yellow-cake uranium, and who REALLY outed a covert CIA agent because her husband wouldn't cover for them... And yeah, I think 4,781 US dead, 130,000 wounded, because of one clown's obsession with starting an unnecessary, unpaid-for war, ARE more important than four who were at the wrong place at the wrong time.
(Not to mention the 241 that died in the barracks at Beirut... Where was the outrage there? Saint Reagan was on the job...)
Those are not "new" talking-points...Those have been around since the Idiot Son allowed the World Trade Center to be bombed in 2001.
LadyJazzer wrote: No more delusional than the witch hunt to come up with something more on Benghazi than has already been beaten to death...That's a delusional opinion too.
Funny...This hasn't changed: We're still wondering about those non-existent WMD's, the yellow-cake uranium, and who REALLY outed a covert CIA agent because her husband wouldn't cover for them... And yeah, I think 4,781 US dead, 130,000 wounded, because of one clown's obsession with starting an unnecessary, unpaid-for war, ARE more important than four who were at the wrong place at the wrong time.
(Not to mention the 241 that died in the barracks at Beirut... Where was the outrage there? Saint Reagan was on the job...)
Those are not "new" talking-points...Those have been around since the Idiot Son allowed the World Trade Center to be bombed in 2001.
Beirut? :faint: Who is the master of deflection? If this is the best response the left has, it is about to get interesting.
