Strangely quiet on capture of Benghazi murderer

As usual, can't answer a direct question. Just more deflection, denial and blah, blah, blah.

So what does Obama plan to trade this terrorist for? A Klondike bar?

When the truth starts to come out, the conservatives take cover in absurdity. I wonder if Susan Rice will get an apology from congress for their attacks on her for claiming a hate video attacking Islam precipitated the attack, because that is starting to look like the truth. This is not going to benefit the rabid Republicans who can't let go of their hate and jump on anything they can find to bash Obama before thoroughly vetting the conclusions they have jumped to.

Gee, I don't know... But Fred found another way to use 'Obama' in an irrelevant sentence...

FredHayek wrote: So what does Obama plan to trade this terrorist for? A Klondike bar?

He really should get some counseling for that ODS problem...

archer wrote: When the truth starts to come out, the conservatives take cover in absurdity. I wonder if Susan Rice will get an apology from congress for their attacks on her for claiming a hate video attacking Islam precipitated the attack, because that is starting to look like the truth. This is not going to benefit the rabid Republicans who can't let go of their hate and jump on anything they can find to bash Obama before thoroughly vetting the conclusions they have jumped to.

Yes, trust Archer to jump to conclusions based on the words of a terrorist.

FredHayek wrote:

archer wrote: When the truth starts to come out, the conservatives take cover in absurdity. I wonder if Susan Rice will get an apology from congress for their attacks on her for claiming a hate video attacking Islam precipitated the attack, because that is starting to look like the truth. This is not going to benefit the rabid Republicans who can't let go of their hate and jump on anything they can find to bash Obama before thoroughly vetting the conclusions they have jumped to.

Yes, trust Archer to jump to conclusions based on the words of a terrorist.

I suspect this terrorists words are closer to the truth than those spoken by the Republicans in Congress. But we don't know, do we, yet you have made no complaints about the conservatives jumping to conclusions and tarnishing the reputation of Susan Rice, and the President and Hillary. Nope, you jump on their bandwagon with both feet. Doesn't matter if they have no facts, if it bashes a Democrat you are just one of the Kool aid drinkers who believes whatever they tell you to believe.

HEARTLESS wrote: As usual, can't answer a direct question. Just more deflection, denial and blah, blah, blah.

Speaking of blah, blah, blah, still waiting for you to provide facts to back up your ridiculous allegations. Anytime now.

Do you mean the requests for additional security due to rising unrest in Benghazi that were denied by the State Dept and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that resulted in American deaths? Or is your question more mindless rhetoric?

The timing is just so interesting on this. Release five terrorists, catch one, and the Dems want to cheer. And the one they capture is trumpeting the administration line about this only being a demonstration, that happens to include rocket launchers and mortar fire teams. (Not even the TEA Party brings rocket launchers and mortar teams to spontaneous demonstrations.)

FredHayek wrote: The timing is just so interesting on this. Release five terrorists, catch one, and the Dems want to cheer. And the one they capture is trumpeting the administration line about this only being a demonstration, that happens to include rocket launchers and mortar fire teams. (Not even the TEA Party brings rocket launchers and mortar teams to spontaneous demonstrations.)

Where did this terrorist claim it was a spontaneous demonstration? What is being claimed by him is that the video precipitated the attack on the embassy.

But I do understand, if the emerging information doesn't fit the Republicans narrative then it must be a lie, or suspicious, or a conspiracy.