Get your propaganda fix now!

Rick wrote: News flash buddy, Mueller didn't dispute anything Barr wrote in that summary.

Wrong as always!

"Special counsel Robert Mueller wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr last month complaining that a four-page memo Barr wrote characterizing Mueller’s findings “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the Russia investigation, two senior Justice Department officials confirmed to POLITICO on Tuesday.
Mueller sent the letter to Barr on March 27, three days after Barr issued his four-page summary, and cited “public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation.” "
www.politico.com/story/2019/04/30/robert...-barr-report-1295269

You really need to keep up Brundon. That letter was sent before the report was released and asked Barr to release the 19 page summary before the report because the media was misreporting what was in the report. Barr declines because he wanted everything released at the same time, which is what happened. Mountains and molehills...

Hellfire, son, you produce more manure than a factory farm. The media was misreporting the report because Barr took so much out of context. That's why the sheep were bleating "no collusion, no obstruction," remember?

Brandon wrote: Hellfire, son, you produce more manure than a factory farm. The media was misreporting the report because Barr took so much out of context. That's why the sheep were bleating "no collusion, no obstruction," remember?

Do you have a statement from Mueller stating that the Barr summary was factually wrong? Do you think Barr is going to get in some kind of trouble for this contempt of congress ploy? He either breaks the laws and complies with congress or he gets charged with contempt of congress for following the law. What will he be charged with and what will the penalty be? Hint: NOTHING, he doesn't give a shit what these unhinged morons do.

These idiots you seem to respect are only doing this because it's their last chance to slow down the real truth that's coming soon... WAIT FOR IT!! LOL!!!

"Mueller says that Barr’s summary “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,” and that as a result, “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation.”
“This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the [Justice] Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” Mueller continues."
www.vox.com/2019/5/1/18525296/mueller-re...lliam-barr-testimony

Helpful hint: You can't type "LOL!!!" after you accuse anyone else of being an unhinged moron.

Hint: Barr released the entire Mueller report. Whatever Mueller was whining about in his letter became moot at that point as all context is there. You are weeks behind the curve here - catch up youngster!

"But Barr didn’t release those introductions and executive summaries as Mueller asked. Instead, he let the “public confusion” fester for nearly four more weeks before finally releasing the full report (with redactions) on April 18."
www.vox.com/2019/5/1/18525296/mueller-re...lliam-barr-testimony

You poor kid! Things must be a lot easier for you wherever you came from.


ETA: Also - there still seem to be some sheeple on the internet who take Barr's decontextualized spin as accurate.