Can We Agree on This?

I will make this short and give a FULL answer later.have appts. stacked today.

I TRULY did not understand/know why women's org. did not get behind the female candidates,it
is stunning to me.....I think you mis posted one of my answers.....about who has the best plan.

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: FOR RICK......I have stated,from the beginning, there is NO ONE with a wise and workable plan.
(shall I re post that statement, dated in a much earlier timeframe) I am despondent and dismayed
that we have come this far and the statement STILL HOLDS true.

The long,excruciating exercise of election day is exhausting....I was hoping for a YOUNGER,
fresher approach to this process.....alas,that was a pipe dream.

While appreciate your attempt to answer the question by giving the opinion of others, they're not really your opinions, are they? You articles focus a lot on these endorsements.. the opinions of others that are meant to sway people to agree with said opinions. Shouldn't intelligent adults construct their own opinions based on what they see and hear from the candidates plus what they have accomplished?

This is what I see from people on the left far too often and it's one of the main reasons the left reeeaaaly hates Trump. They care so much about what other people think, like the media, like Hollywood celebs, like (name your respected person ).

In my opinion, none of the female candidates were universally loved by the people who tell all of you who you should like. Michelle Obama would have run away with it had she run and she could have just stayed home and put out a few youtube videos that the media would run over and over for free. She wouldn't have to visit one state or shake one hand, all she would have to do is say that she was continuing to offer more hope and change and, like her husband, wouldn't have to give a single specific policy proposal. All the left's opinion makers love her and they would make sure you continued to love her as well.

Even though Biden is in the early stages of dementia, the left loves him, especially since he was the VP of their favorite. They all have to know he's losing it, but their feeling for him are stronger than their feelings for any of the women. He doesn't stand for a single thing, he adjusts to the wokeness trend and is forgiven for his groping and hair sniffing creepiness. His policy proposals also change with the wind which makes him perfect for a party that doesn't want a guy like Trump that they could never control. Now if you're like me and think both parties suck, you want someone like Trump that is willing to expose both worthless parties for what they are.. but I digress.

Bottom line is that for a woman to be the Democrat nominee, they either have to be the wife of a past Dem president or they have to be universally liked by opinion leaders..
I think Oprah or Maddow would qualify as well but can't think of many others.

I do NOT understand your reply....(bolded)....that IS my opinion....not borrowed from another source.

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: FOR RICK......I have stated,from the beginning, there is NO ONE with a wise and workable plan.
(shall I re post that statement, dated in a much earlier timeframe) I am despondent and dismayed
that we have come this far and the statement STILL HOLDS true.

The long,excruciating exercise of election day is exhausting....I was hoping for a YOUNGER,
fresher approach to this process.....alas,that was a pipe dream.

While appreciate your attempt to answer the question by giving the opinion of others, they're not really your opinions, are they? You articles focus a lot on these endorsements.. the opinions of others that are meant to sway people to agree with said opinions. Shouldn't intelligent adults construct their own opinions based on what they see and hear from the candidates plus what they have accomplished?

This is what I see from people on the left far too often and it's one of the main reasons the left reeeaaaly hates Trump. They care so much about what other people think, like the media, like Hollywood celebs, like (name your respected person ).

In my opinion, none of the female candidates were universally loved by the people who tell all of you who you should like. Michelle Obama would have run away with it had she run and she could have just stayed home and put out a few youtube videos that the media would run over and over for free. She wouldn't have to visit one state or shake one hand, all she would have to do is say that she was continuing to offer more hope and change and, like her husband, wouldn't have to give a single specific policy proposal. All the left's opinion makers love her and they would make sure you continued to love her as well.

Even though Biden is in the early stages of dementia, the left loves him, especially since he was the VP of their favorite. They all have to know he's losing it, but their feeling for him are stronger than their feelings for any of the women. He doesn't stand for a single thing, he adjusts to the wokeness trend and is forgiven for his groping and hair sniffing creepiness. His policy proposals also change with the wind which makes him perfect for a party that doesn't want a guy like Trump that they could never control. Now if you're like me and think both parties suck, you want someone like Trump that is willing to expose both worthless parties for what they are.. but I digress.

Bottom line is that for a woman to be the Democrat nominee, they either have to be the wife of a past Dem president or they have to be universally liked by opinion leaders..
I think Oprah or Maddow would qualify as well but can't think of many others.

I do NOT understand your reply....(bolded)....that IS my opinion....not borrowed from another source.

When I ask for your opinion and you post a couple articles, that isn't a good answer. I just want to know why YOU think woke Democrats don't want one of the women who ran.

AND I replied to U......NO COMPREHENSION. It appears to be similar to what woman go thru
when they reach the glass ceiling. FEMALES will take the stance of....""I had to fight like hell to
get here,YOU don't get to climb over me on the way up......and they will distance themselves
from being a mentor/assistance. THAT stance is one I have witnessed and even way back then
was surreal to me......I thought there was a sisterhood, that came out of the Gloria "glory"years
WRONG.....it does not look like THAT has changed anything. If any mentoring is going on, it appears to be a POWERFUL male molding the fledgling female....correct me if I am wrong,
because I am,after all, part of the"greys".....

homeagain wrote: AND I replied to U......NO COMPREHENSION. It appears to be similar to what woman go thru
when they reach the glass ceiling. FEMALES will take the stance of....""I had to fight like hell to
get here,YOU don't get to climb over me on the way up......and they will distance themselves
from being a mentor/assistance. THAT stance is one I have witnessed and even way back then
was surreal to me......I thought there was a sisterhood, that came out of the Gloria "glory"years
WRONG.....it does not look like THAT has changed anything. If any mentoring is going on, it appears to be a POWERFUL male molding the fledgling female....correct me if I am wrong,
because I am,after all, part of the"greys".....

I think you're saying the Democrat and Indy women have created a glass ceiling that they do not wish to break. You as a collective have the majority in the Dem primary yet you have collectively chosen the back the men, the crazy and the mentally ill over some women who seem pretty smart (bad policies but pretty smart). No man is telling these women they can't pick a woman so men are out of the equation. You all have the power yet you don't use it. Baffling unless these are all just very bad, very unqualified, or very unlikable. I see no other reasons possible if Democrat and Indy women really want a woman to be president. What other factor(s) am I missing?

"very unlikable''.......TULSI GABBARD would fit that description AND the DNC has dumped her
like so much garbage.

I like Tulsi. She's a bit liberal, but she's not establishment and Clinton hates her. That's like an endorsement for me. I think Trump should dump Pence and run with Tulsi. I know it would never happen, but it would be nice to drop partisanship for a while.

Don't worry HA, you'll be getting a woman president soon enough:

""very unlikable''.......TULSI GABBARD would fit that description AND the DNC has dumped her"
Does this mean that "likeablilty" is more important to women than being qualified? My wife does not agree.

homeagain wrote: "very unlikable''.......TULSI GABBARD would fit that description AND the DNC has dumped her
like so much garbage.

And if this is the kind of woman you don't like, this is why you'll never elect a woman. She's serving our country in congress as well as in the military. She's running on ending the endless wars yet the rest of the losers have barely mentioned that. She's a woman with principles, unlike the rest of those women who got a whole lot more attention from the media that is now saying the last woman is out. Tulsi Gabbard was your best shot and you all blew it.

I agree with Pony Soldier, Trump should pick her as VP and wipe the floor with your old senile moron.

You did NOT understand my post......I agree with your wife.